Risks of cataract surgery in solid and hematologic cancer survivors

In this nationwide retrospective cohort study, we investigated the risk of cataract surgery among cancer survivors compared to propensity score (PS)-matched non-cancer controls. This study included 4.5 million adults in the National Health Insurance Service database who underwent health screenings between year 2011 and 2014. PS-matching at a 3:1 ratio resulted in 167,766 non-cancer controls and 55,968 patients with cancer. During a period of up to 10 years, 7703 (13.8%) patients with cancer and 24,369 (14.5%) patients in the control group underwent cataract surgery. Survival analysis showed no difference in cataract surgery risk between the overall cancer cohort and controls. Analysis by cancer types showed that solid cancers did not increase the risk of cataract surgery compared to controls, whereas hematologic cancer survivors exhibited a significantly increased risk of cataract surgery, particularly between 2 and 5 years post-index date (hazard ratio at second year, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.05; p = 0.027). Among hematologic cancer survivors, factors significantly associated with increased cataract surgery risk included advanced age, leukemia diagnosis, bone marrow transplantation, and prolonged steroid use. This study highlights the elevated risk of cataract surgery among hematologic cancer survivors, emphasizing the need for long-term ophthalmologic follow-up in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-16229-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risks of cataract surgery in solid and hematologic cancer survivors

Suk Ho Byeon, Sunyeup Kim, Yong Joon Kim, Sung Soo Kim et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
1.63
article

Risks of cataract surgery in solid and hematologic cancer survivors

Suk Ho Byeon, Sunyeup Kim, Yong Joon Kim, Sung Soo Kim, Seung Won Lee, Christopher Seungkyu Lee, Hyunjean Jung, Byoung Hyuck Kim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this nationwide retrospective cohort study, we investigated the risk of cataract surgery among cancer survivors compared to propensity score (PS)-matched non-cancer controls. This study included 4.5 million adults in the National Health Insurance Service database who underwent health screenings between year 2011 and 2014. PS-matching at a 3:1 ratio resulted in 167,766 non-cancer controls and 55,968 patients with cancer. During a period of up to 10 years, 7703 (13.8%) patients with cancer and 24,369 (14.5%) patients in the control group underwent cataract surgery. Survival analysis showed no difference in cataract surgery risk between the overall cancer cohort and controls. Analysis by cancer types showed that solid cancers did not increase the risk of cataract surgery compared to controls, whereas hematologic cancer survivors exhibited a significantly increased risk of cataract surgery, particularly between 2 and 5 years post-index date (hazard ratio at second year, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.05; p = 0.027). Among hematologic cancer survivors, factors significantly associated with increased cataract surgery risk included advanced age, leukemia diagnosis, bone marrow transplantation, and prolonged steroid use. This study highlights the elevated risk of cataract surgery among hematologic cancer survivors, emphasizing the need for long-term ophthalmologic follow-up in this population.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Seoul National University (KR), Yonsei University (KR), Seoul Metropolitan Government (KR), SNUH SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center (KR), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.