Measurement quality metrics to improve absolute microbial cell counting

Total and viable microbial cell counts are increasingly important for applications including live biotherapeutic products, food safety, and probiotics. In microbiology, cells are quantified using methods such as colony forming unit (CFU), flow cytometry, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), but different methods measure different aspects of the cells (measurands), and results may not be directly comparable across methods. In the absence of a ground-truth reference material for cell count, one cannot quantify the accuracy of any cell counting method, which limits method performance assessments and comparisons. Herein, a modified analysis of cell counting methods based on the ISO 20391-2:2019 standard was developed and demonstrated for microbial cell samples diluted over a log-scale range of concentrations. <i>Escherichia coli</i> samples ranging in concentration from ~5 x 10<sup>5</sup> cells/mL to 2 x 10<sup>7</sup> cells/mL were quantified using CFU, Coulter principle, fluorescence flow cytometry, and impedance flow cytometry. Quality metrics modified from the ISO standard were calculated for each method and shown to be repeatable across replicate experiments. The quality metrics illustrate large differences in proportionality and variability across methods, with total cell counts in good agreement and viable cell count having more variability. As the ISO standard is meant to guide fit-for-purpose method selection, interpretation of the results and quality metrics can drive method choice and optimization. The framework introduced here will help researchers select fit-for-purpose counting methods for quantification of microbial total and viable cells across a range of applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1631377
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Biosensors and Analytical Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measurement quality metrics to improve absolute microbial cell counting

Alshae’ Logan-Jackson, Kirsten Parratt, Stephanie L. Servetas, L. Pierce et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Microbiology
Biosensors and Analytical Detection
0.67
article

Measurement quality metrics to improve absolute microbial cell counting

Alshae’ Logan-Jackson, Kirsten Parratt, Stephanie L. Servetas, L. Pierce, Nancy J. Lin, Monique E. Hunter, Joy P. Dunkers, Jennifer N. Dootz, Sumona Sarkar, David C. Newton
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Total and viable microbial cell counts are increasingly important for applications including live biotherapeutic products, food safety, and probiotics. In microbiology, cells are quantified using methods such as colony forming unit (CFU), flow cytometry, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), but different methods measure different aspects of the cells (measurands), and results may not be directly comparable across methods. In the absence of a ground-truth reference material for cell count, one cannot quantify the accuracy of any cell counting method, which limits method performance assessments and comparisons. Herein, a modified analysis of cell counting methods based on the ISO 20391-2:2019 standard was developed and demonstrated for microbial cell samples diluted over a log-scale range of concentrations. <i>Escherichia coli</i> samples ranging in concentration from ~5 x 10<sup>5</sup> cells/mL to 2 x 10<sup>7</sup> cells/mL were quantified using CFU, Coulter principle, fluorescence flow cytometry, and impedance flow cytometry. Quality metrics modified from the ISO standard were calculated for each method and shown to be repeatable across replicate experiments. The quality metrics illustrate large differences in proportionality and variability across methods, with total cell counts in good agreement and viable cell count having more variability. As the ISO standard is meant to guide fit-for-purpose method selection, interpretation of the results and quality metrics can drive method choice and optimization. The framework introduced here will help researchers select fit-for-purpose counting methods for quantification of microbial total and viable cells across a range of applications.

Frontiers in MicrobiologyVol. 16
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Biosensors and Analytical Detection
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.