Has NATO Become a Liability for Europe?

The American electorate and foreign policy elite’s dissatisfaction with NATO, the decades-long debates about the balance of benefits and costs attending American retrenchment from overseas engagements, the narrowing of power differentials between the United States and China, and a growing animus towards Europe on issues ranging from gender-mainstreaming to trade to defence suggest that it is time for Europeans to reconsider their fidelity to NATO, participation in the American-dominated and -instrumentalized NATO integrated military command (IMC), the continued basing of US armed forces in Europe, and the unrestricted American use of European air and maritime spaces for conducting global military operations. In other words, it is well past time to ask: Is the hedged American security guarantee sufficiently robust to justify continued American leadership? Would Europeans be better off – or at least no worse off – if they were to leave the IMC and initiate a Europe-dictated American departure? If the major European powers decided to send Americans home, would it contribute to the European Union (EU) goal of strategic autonomy, lend Europeans greater leverage in shaping US foreign policies within the European neighbourhood, and make Europeans less susceptible to American ultimata? This article addresses those questions.

Publication Details

Journal
European Foreign Affairs Review
Published
2025-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2025021
Primary Topic
International Law and Aviation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Has NATO Become a Liability for Europe?

European Foreign Affairs Review
International Law and Aviation
article

Has NATO Become a Liability for Europe?

article en

Abstract

The American electorate and foreign policy elite’s dissatisfaction with NATO, the decades-long debates about the balance of benefits and costs attending American retrenchment from overseas engagements, the narrowing of power differentials between the United States and China, and a growing animus towards Europe on issues ranging from gender-mainstreaming to trade to defence suggest that it is time for Europeans to reconsider their fidelity to NATO, participation in the American-dominated and -instrumentalized NATO integrated military command (IMC), the continued basing of US armed forces in Europe, and the unrestricted American use of European air and maritime spaces for conducting global military operations. In other words, it is well past time to ask: Is the hedged American security guarantee sufficiently robust to justify continued American leadership? Would Europeans be better off – or at least no worse off – if they were to leave the IMC and initiate a Europe-dictated American departure? If the major European powers decided to send Americans home, would it contribute to the European Union (EU) goal of strategic autonomy, lend Europeans greater leverage in shaping US foreign policies within the European neighbourhood, and make Europeans less susceptible to American ultimata? This article addresses those questions.

European Foreign Affairs ReviewVol. 30(Issue 2)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
International Law and Aviation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.