Dialog Concerning the Two Shock Codes

Abstract In this paper, we summarize the shock physics and the treatment of radiative transfer in two well-established shock codes—the MAPPINGS code and the Cox/Raymond code. We compare the ionization states, temperatures, electron densities, and energy transportations of the shock models with shock velocities of 50, 110, 150, and 300 km s −1 . In summary, both codes adopt the Rankine–Hugoniot flow equation to describe the shock flows, giving the same shock physical properties in the immediate area behind the shock fronts. The different treatments of radiative transfer in these two codes lead to somewhat different computations of the ionization and thermal structures of shocks, as well as the emission-line fluxes. This work highlights the importance of the delicate treatment of photoionization in shock models, providing insight for the future development of shock codes, such as 3D shock codes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adeca2
Primary Topic
Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dialog Concerning the Two Shock Codes

J. C. Raymond, Yifei Jin
The Astrophysical Journal
Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
article

Dialog Concerning the Two Shock Codes

J. C. Raymond, Yifei Jin
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we summarize the shock physics and the treatment of radiative transfer in two well-established shock codes—the MAPPINGS code and the Cox/Raymond code. We compare the ionization states, temperatures, electron densities, and energy transportations of the shock models with shock velocities of 50, 110, 150, and 300 km s −1 . In summary, both codes adopt the Rankine–Hugoniot flow equation to describe the shock flows, giving the same shock physical properties in the immediate area behind the shock fronts. The different treatments of radiative transfer in these two codes lead to somewhat different computations of the ionization and thermal structures of shocks, as well as the emission-line fluxes. This work highlights the importance of the delicate treatment of photoionization in shock models, providing insight for the future development of shock codes, such as 3D shock codes.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 989(2)
Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
Westlake University
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.