Navigating male-dominated spaces

Abstract This article explores the phenomenon of authorised translations from the perspective of gender through archival studies of two understudied Victorian women translators from German into English, Fanny Elizabeth Bunnètt (1833–1875) and L. Dora Schmitz (1844–1926). While researchers have started to fill the gaps of a history of translators by focusing on translators of scientific genres, historical translators of humanities scholarship remain underresearched. Archival-based research on these translators may help shift our focus to hitherto little-explored aspects of the translation event, such as authorised translations. The two case studies discussed in this paper shed light on the logistics behind authorised translations, and on how some women translators navigated this mode of publication in order to consolidate their professional positions. The agency of Bunnètt and Schmitz was embedded in a gendered network of professional and personal contacts, which both enabled and restricted them in their translational pursuits. Archival materials on Bunnètt show how women translators strategically selected and cultivated contacts in order to navigate the decidedly male-dominated professional spaces of scholarship and publishing. Schmitz’s case proves that translating by no means had to be a female attempt to evade the public gaze.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Target International Journal of Translation Studies
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.23188.rei
Primary Topic
African history and culture studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating male-dominated spaces

Carmen Reisinger
1 links
Target International Journal of Translation Studies
African history and culture studies
article

Navigating male-dominated spaces

Carmen Reisinger
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article explores the phenomenon of authorised translations from the perspective of gender through archival studies of two understudied Victorian women translators from German into English, Fanny Elizabeth Bunnètt (1833–1875) and L. Dora Schmitz (1844–1926). While researchers have started to fill the gaps of a history of translators by focusing on translators of scientific genres, historical translators of humanities scholarship remain underresearched. Archival-based research on these translators may help shift our focus to hitherto little-explored aspects of the translation event, such as authorised translations. The two case studies discussed in this paper shed light on the logistics behind authorised translations, and on how some women translators navigated this mode of publication in order to consolidate their professional positions. The agency of Bunnètt and Schmitz was embedded in a gendered network of professional and personal contacts, which both enabled and restricted them in their translational pursuits. Archival materials on Bunnètt show how women translators strategically selected and cultivated contacts in order to navigate the decidedly male-dominated professional spaces of scholarship and publishing. Schmitz’s case proves that translating by no means had to be a female attempt to evade the public gaze.

Target International Journal of Translation StudiesVol. 37(4)
Hacettepe University (TR), KU Leuven (BE)
Onderzoeksraad, KU Leuven
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
African history and culture studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.