The politics of intersectional (un)belonging: a duoethnographic mapping study with academic women

In this paper, we develop duoethnographic mapping methods to explore how gender and intersectional identities shape belonging in higher education. Belonging is often presented as fixed and unambiguously positive, however, such framings neglect the complex and contingent experience of (un)belonging. Drawing on our experiences as early career academic women we investigate how institutional norms interact with embodied (dis)advantages to produce diverse forms of (un)belonging, highlighting the importance of attending to affective-socio-material configurations. Through duoethnographic mapping, we trace dimensions of (un)belonging across a range of cartographies (bodies and spaces), territories (university campuses and nation states) and temporalities (intergenerational and everyday rhythms). We show how not belonging can be both constraining and generative, producing feelings of imposterism but also unexpected empowerment and ambivalence. Beyond challenging simplified conceptions of belonging, we contribute knowledge on how combining mapping and duoethnographic methods can surface nuanced understandings of intersectional experience in academia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gender and Education
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2025.2546055
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The politics of intersectional (un)belonging: a duoethnographic mapping study with academic women

Reshmi Lahiri-Roy, Maree Martinussen
1 citations
Gender and Education
Gender Diversity and Inequality
3.87
article

The politics of intersectional (un)belonging: a duoethnographic mapping study with academic women

Reshmi Lahiri-Roy, Maree Martinussen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we develop duoethnographic mapping methods to explore how gender and intersectional identities shape belonging in higher education. Belonging is often presented as fixed and unambiguously positive, however, such framings neglect the complex and contingent experience of (un)belonging. Drawing on our experiences as early career academic women we investigate how institutional norms interact with embodied (dis)advantages to produce diverse forms of (un)belonging, highlighting the importance of attending to affective-socio-material configurations. Through duoethnographic mapping, we trace dimensions of (un)belonging across a range of cartographies (bodies and spaces), territories (university campuses and nation states) and temporalities (intergenerational and everyday rhythms). We show how not belonging can be both constraining and generative, producing feelings of imposterism but also unexpected empowerment and ambivalence. Beyond challenging simplified conceptions of belonging, we contribute knowledge on how combining mapping and duoethnographic methods can surface nuanced understandings of intersectional experience in academia.

Gender and EducationVol. 38(2)
Federation University (AU), Charles Sturt University (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.