AI Paraphrasing Tools in EFL Undergraduate Thesis Writing: Students' Perceptions and Influential Factors

English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students often struggle with academic writing, especially when working on undergraduate theses. This study explores the perceptions and factors influencing using AI-based paraphrasing tools by English as a Foreign Language (EFL) undergraduate students in their thesis writing. The study used a qualitative descriptive method and a case study design involving 53 students. The data collection method used a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews with five participants from the 9th semester of the English education study program. Data collection instruments used questionnaires and interviews. The data analysis technique used qualitative descriptive analysis. The study results showed that students considered AI-based paraphrasing tools helpful in saving time, improving vocabulary, and avoiding plagiarism. The main factors influencing their use included time management, institutional requirements for originality, and the desire to improve the quality of writing. Despite positive perceptions, students also expressed concerns about over-reliance on the tools and the potential for decreased originality. The study concluded that although AI-based paraphrasing tools support academic writing, they should be a complement, not a substitute, for critical writing skills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v9i1.86696
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Paraphrasing Tools in EFL Undergraduate Thesis Writing: Students' Perceptions and Influential Factors

Machdalena Vianty, Eryansyah Eryansyah, Silvia Pratami
Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
Online Learning and Analytics
article

AI Paraphrasing Tools in EFL Undergraduate Thesis Writing: Students' Perceptions and Influential Factors

Machdalena Vianty, Eryansyah Eryansyah, Silvia Pratami
article en

Abstract

English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students often struggle with academic writing, especially when working on undergraduate theses. This study explores the perceptions and factors influencing using AI-based paraphrasing tools by English as a Foreign Language (EFL) undergraduate students in their thesis writing. The study used a qualitative descriptive method and a case study design involving 53 students. The data collection method used a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews with five participants from the 9th semester of the English education study program. Data collection instruments used questionnaires and interviews. The data analysis technique used qualitative descriptive analysis. The study results showed that students considered AI-based paraphrasing tools helpful in saving time, improving vocabulary, and avoiding plagiarism. The main factors influencing their use included time management, institutional requirements for originality, and the desire to improve the quality of writing. Despite positive perceptions, students also expressed concerns about over-reliance on the tools and the potential for decreased originality. The study concluded that although AI-based paraphrasing tools support academic writing, they should be a complement, not a substitute, for critical writing skills.

Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan dan PembelajaranVol. 9(1)
Sriwijaya University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.