Comparing sustainable fuel adoption in the energy transition for maritime and aviation transport

Maritime and aviation transport are widely recognised as sectors where reducing greenhouse gas emissions is particularly challenging due to their reliance on energy-dense fuels and the challenges associated with direct electrification. These sectors face increasing pressure to defossilise and reduce emissions in line with global climate goals, while simultaneously facing unique technological, operational, and economic uncertainties. This study addresses a key research gap by comparing the maritime and aviation sectors for common factors and sector-specific differences in their transition to green e-fuels produced from renewable electricity and sustainable CO 2 . A techno-economic assessment is conducted to evaluate alternative fuel and propulsion options using the levelised cost of mobility framework. The analysis also incorporates the pricing of non-CO 2 greenhouse gases and air pollutant emissions. Results show that e-ammonia or e-LNG combustion is the most cost-effective option for maritime transport, when emission costs are excluded, whereas hydrogen fuel cells become more economical when these costs are internalised. In aviation, e-kerosene use in conventional aircraft presents the lowest costs, regardless of the year or emission pricing. The findings highlight the importance of considering unique characteristics of each sector and tailored defossilisation and decarbonisation strategies that consider sector-specific constraints. To sustainably meet the growing demand for transport fuels, rapid investments in renewable electricity generation, electrolysers, and e-fuel synthesis are essential. Development of strong regulatory frameworks and financial instruments will be critical to support early deployment of e-fuels and minimise the risks. • Green e-fuel utilisation costs in the maritime and aviation sectors in 2030–2050. • The impact of greenhouse gas and air pollutant emission pricing is analysed. • e-Fuels are competitive with fossil fuels in shipping when emissions are priced. • e-Kerosene for aviation is the least cost solution in 2050 with emission pricing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Published
2025-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116124
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing sustainable fuel adoption in the energy transition for maritime and aviation transport

Sotiria Lagouvardou, Tansu Galimova, Christian Breyer, Hamed Kian
7 citations
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
5.59
article

Comparing sustainable fuel adoption in the energy transition for maritime and aviation transport

Sotiria Lagouvardou, Tansu Galimova, Christian Breyer, Hamed Kian
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Maritime and aviation transport are widely recognised as sectors where reducing greenhouse gas emissions is particularly challenging due to their reliance on energy-dense fuels and the challenges associated with direct electrification. These sectors face increasing pressure to defossilise and reduce emissions in line with global climate goals, while simultaneously facing unique technological, operational, and economic uncertainties. This study addresses a key research gap by comparing the maritime and aviation sectors for common factors and sector-specific differences in their transition to green e-fuels produced from renewable electricity and sustainable CO 2 . A techno-economic assessment is conducted to evaluate alternative fuel and propulsion options using the levelised cost of mobility framework. The analysis also incorporates the pricing of non-CO 2 greenhouse gases and air pollutant emissions. Results show that e-ammonia or e-LNG combustion is the most cost-effective option for maritime transport, when emission costs are excluded, whereas hydrogen fuel cells become more economical when these costs are internalised. In aviation, e-kerosene use in conventional aircraft presents the lowest costs, regardless of the year or emission pricing. The findings highlight the importance of considering unique characteristics of each sector and tailored defossilisation and decarbonisation strategies that consider sector-specific constraints. To sustainably meet the growing demand for transport fuels, rapid investments in renewable electricity generation, electrolysers, and e-fuel synthesis are essential. Development of strong regulatory frameworks and financial instruments will be critical to support early deployment of e-fuels and minimise the risks. • Green e-fuel utilisation costs in the maritime and aviation sectors in 2030–2050. • The impact of greenhouse gas and air pollutant emission pricing is analysed. • e-Fuels are competitive with fossil fuels in shipping when emissions are priced. • e-Kerosene for aviation is the least cost solution in 2050 with emission pricing.

Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVol. 224
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
5.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.