Social inequity disrupts reward-based learning

Through reward-based learning, people learn which actions generate which outcomes in which situations. What happens to human reward-based learning when outcomes are shared? Here we show that learning is impacted by inequity in the distribution of rewards (self-other) and others' identity. In three experiments, participants could learn how different actions, in response to different stimuli, generated different monetary rewards, each split between the participant and a member of a particular social group. Overall, participants learned more slowly and less successfully when they received a smaller (vs larger) share of the total reward. Stereotypes about the partner's social group additionally modulated learning rates when cognitive load was reduced, with lower perceived warmth or competence hampering learning from the partner's share. Computational modeling showed participants' learning was best explained by adapting the standard reinforcement learning model to account for stereotypes and inequity information, demonstrating that social context modulates non-social learning processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Psychology
Published
2025-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00300-y
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social inequity disrupts reward-based learning

Huang Ham, Adrianna C. Jenkins
Communications Psychology
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Social inequity disrupts reward-based learning

Huang Ham, Adrianna C. Jenkins
article en

Abstract

Through reward-based learning, people learn which actions generate which outcomes in which situations. What happens to human reward-based learning when outcomes are shared? Here we show that learning is impacted by inequity in the distribution of rewards (self-other) and others' identity. In three experiments, participants could learn how different actions, in response to different stimuli, generated different monetary rewards, each split between the participant and a member of a particular social group. Overall, participants learned more slowly and less successfully when they received a smaller (vs larger) share of the total reward. Stereotypes about the partner's social group additionally modulated learning rates when cognitive load was reduced, with lower perceived warmth or competence hampering learning from the partner's share. Computational modeling showed participants' learning was best explained by adapting the standard reinforcement learning model to account for stereotypes and inequity information, demonstrating that social context modulates non-social learning processes.

Communications PsychologyVol. 3(1)
Princeton University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
National Science Foundation
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.