The effects and underlying mechanisms of modified biochar combined with nitrification inhibitors on nitrous oxide mitigation in acidic soils

Acidic soils are recognized as hotspot for nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions, and effective N<sub>2</sub>O mitigation strategies are lacking. Biochar and its modified products have emerged as promising soil amendments for improving soil quality and mitigating N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. However, the mitigation efficiency of biochar and modified biochar and whether it can synergize with the nitrification inhibitor (3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate; DMPP) to further decrease N<sub>2</sub>O emission in acidic soils has not been sufficiently investigated. Therefore, this study investigated the effects and mechanisms of pristine biochar (B1), alkali-modified biochar (B2), and polyethylenimine-alkali-modified biochar (B3), applied alone or in combination with DMPP on N₂O emissions. The results showed that B2 application significantly decreased N<sub>2</sub>O emission by 38.9 %, achieving higher mitigation efficiency than B1. Nevertheless, B3 application significantly increased N<sub>2</sub>O emissions by 119.5 %. Combining B1 with DMPP did not achieve higher N<sub>2</sub>O mitigation efficiency compared with DMPP alone, likely because B1 amendment observably improved soil organic carbon. Notably, a synergistic effect on N₂O mitigation (59.6 %) was observed when B2 was combined with DMPP. After alkali modification, B2, with the largest specific surface areas, recruited more N<sub>2</sub>O reducing microbes and efficiently increased the nosZ gene abundance. In addition, B2 was prepared through high-temperature carbonization, resulting in lower C content, which did not limit the DMPP efficiency. DMPP alone significantly decreased N<sub>2</sub>O emission by reducing the abundance of the amoA gene of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Therefore, the highest mitigation efficiency of B2 combined with DMPP is attributed to lower N<sub>2</sub>O production through nitrification and enhancement of N<sub>2</sub>O reduction via denitrification. Moreover, the improvement status of biochar on soil pH and organic carbon might determine whether the combination of biochar and DMPP has a synergistic or antagonistic effect on N<sub>2</sub>O mitigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.118876
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effects and underlying mechanisms of modified biochar combined with nitrification inhibitors on nitrous oxide mitigation in acidic soils

Huayi Chen, Churong Liu, Junhua Ao, Qihua Wu et al.
2 citations
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
2.37
article

The effects and underlying mechanisms of modified biochar combined with nitrification inhibitors on nitrous oxide mitigation in acidic soils

Huayi Chen, Churong Liu, Junhua Ao, Qihua Wu, Bo Li, Diwen Chen, Wenling Zhou
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Acidic soils are recognized as hotspot for nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions, and effective N<sub>2</sub>O mitigation strategies are lacking. Biochar and its modified products have emerged as promising soil amendments for improving soil quality and mitigating N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. However, the mitigation efficiency of biochar and modified biochar and whether it can synergize with the nitrification inhibitor (3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate; DMPP) to further decrease N<sub>2</sub>O emission in acidic soils has not been sufficiently investigated. Therefore, this study investigated the effects and mechanisms of pristine biochar (B1), alkali-modified biochar (B2), and polyethylenimine-alkali-modified biochar (B3), applied alone or in combination with DMPP on N₂O emissions. The results showed that B2 application significantly decreased N<sub>2</sub>O emission by 38.9 %, achieving higher mitigation efficiency than B1. Nevertheless, B3 application significantly increased N<sub>2</sub>O emissions by 119.5 %. Combining B1 with DMPP did not achieve higher N<sub>2</sub>O mitigation efficiency compared with DMPP alone, likely because B1 amendment observably improved soil organic carbon. Notably, a synergistic effect on N₂O mitigation (59.6 %) was observed when B2 was combined with DMPP. After alkali modification, B2, with the largest specific surface areas, recruited more N<sub>2</sub>O reducing microbes and efficiently increased the nosZ gene abundance. In addition, B2 was prepared through high-temperature carbonization, resulting in lower C content, which did not limit the DMPP efficiency. DMPP alone significantly decreased N<sub>2</sub>O emission by reducing the abundance of the amoA gene of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Therefore, the highest mitigation efficiency of B2 combined with DMPP is attributed to lower N<sub>2</sub>O production through nitrification and enhancement of N<sub>2</sub>O reduction via denitrification. Moreover, the improvement status of biochar on soil pH and organic carbon might determine whether the combination of biochar and DMPP has a synergistic or antagonistic effect on N<sub>2</sub>O mitigation.

Ecotoxicology and Environmental SafetyVol. 303
Hainan University (CN), Guangdong Academy of Sciences (CN)
China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, China Agricultural Research System, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.