Demystifying The Myelin <i>g</i> Ratio: Its Origin, Derivation and Interpretation

Most studies involving myelin <i>g</i> ratios over the past 120 years assume this metric enumerates differences in myelin thickness (larger <i>g</i> ratio = thinner myelin) with axon or fiber diameter. And, moreover, such changes are directly correlated with internodal function (conduction velocity). However, such assumptions are warranted only in the absence of experimental errors and artifacts (i.e. under theoretical conditions). In reality, <i>g</i> ratios can easily under- or overestimate the rate of change for this relation in excess of 10%, especially for small caliber fibers. Typical analyses of myelin internodes rely on an explicit mathematical model, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:mtext>ratio</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>,</mml:mtext></mml:math> where D<sub>A</sub> is axon diameter and D<sub>F</sub> is fiber diameter (myelin plus axon). Shown recently and herein, this model approximates normal physiological conditions only when the axon-fiber diameter relation is directly proportional, whence it is concordant with the axomyelin unit model. However, in transient or non-steady states (development/aging, disease or myelin plasticity) with linear but not directly proportional relations, <i>g</i> ratios may not accurately describe myelin structure. Acceptance of this counterintuitive assertion is predicated on a detailed understanding of the <i>g</i> ratio - its origins, properties and the biology represented - which has been heretofore unexplored. In light of such <i>g</i> ratio limitations, and toward consistency with experimental data, two more reliable metrics are proposed, the myelin <i>g<sub>c</sub></i> ratio and the <i>g'</i> cline. But irrespective which of metric is preferred , the analysis herein shows that the axon-to-fiber diameter ratio under normal physiological conditions is a constant for all fiber diameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASN NEURO
Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17590914.2025.2542166
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Demystifying The Myelin g Ratio: Its Origin, Derivation and Interpretation

Alexander Gow
1 citations
ASN NEURO
Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
1.36
article

Demystifying The Myelin g Ratio: Its Origin, Derivation and Interpretation

Alexander Gow
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Most studies involving myelin <i>g</i> ratios over the past 120 years assume this metric enumerates differences in myelin thickness (larger <i>g</i> ratio = thinner myelin) with axon or fiber diameter. And, moreover, such changes are directly correlated with internodal function (conduction velocity). However, such assumptions are warranted only in the absence of experimental errors and artifacts (i.e. under theoretical conditions). In reality, <i>g</i> ratios can easily under- or overestimate the rate of change for this relation in excess of 10%, especially for small caliber fibers. Typical analyses of myelin internodes rely on an explicit mathematical model, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:mtext>ratio</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>,</mml:mtext></mml:math> where D<sub>A</sub> is axon diameter and D<sub>F</sub> is fiber diameter (myelin plus axon). Shown recently and herein, this model approximates normal physiological conditions only when the axon-fiber diameter relation is directly proportional, whence it is concordant with the axomyelin unit model. However, in transient or non-steady states (development/aging, disease or myelin plasticity) with linear but not directly proportional relations, <i>g</i> ratios may not accurately describe myelin structure. Acceptance of this counterintuitive assertion is predicated on a detailed understanding of the <i>g</i> ratio - its origins, properties and the biology represented - which has been heretofore unexplored. In light of such <i>g</i> ratio limitations, and toward consistency with experimental data, two more reliable metrics are proposed, the myelin <i>g<sub>c</sub></i> ratio and the <i>g'</i> cline. But irrespective which of metric is preferred , the analysis herein shows that the axon-to-fiber diameter ratio under normal physiological conditions is a constant for all fiber diameters.

ASN NEUROVol. 17(1)
Wayne State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.