An efficient detection method for camel milk quality based on dielectric spectroscopy technology

To address the long-standing dual challenges in the camel milk industry, namely, the difficulty in identifying adulteration and the severe lag in nutritional component detection, this study analyzed the variation patterns of the dielectric constant (ε') and dielectric loss factor (ε") of camel milk fat, protein, and lactose. Based on the dielectric spectrum, detection models were constructed using partial least squares (PLS), convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory network (LSTM), CNN-LSTM, and an optimized CNN-LSTM fused with the Crested Porcupine Optimizer (CPO) and squeeze-and-excitation network (CPO-CNN-LSTM-SEN) for camel milk quality detection. The results indicate that across the 0.1 to 26.5 GHz frequency range, ε' exhibits a gradual decreasing trend with increasing frequency, and ε" demonstrates an initial decrease followed by an increase. Both ε' and ε" decrease with elevated fat, protein, and lactose content, showing strong negative correlations. Among CNN, LSTM, and CNN-LSTM, CNN-LSTM achieved optimal performance in discriminating camel milk adulteration with water and similar species milk (e.g., cow, goat, and mixed milk), attaining a 100% discrimination rate. Among PLS, CNN, LSTM, CNN-LSTM, and CPO-CNN-LSTM-SEN, CPO-CNN-LSTM-SEN performed the best in simultaneous quantitative determination of the 3 nutritional components of camel milk (fat, protein, and lactose). Its prediction set determination coefficients R<sub>P</sub><sup>2</sup> reached 0.9334, 0.9602, and 0.9703, respectively, with prediction set root mean square error below 0.1392%. Validation of the optimal CPO-CNN-LSTM-SEN model yielded R<sup>2</sup> values of 0.9186, 0.9507, and 0.9456, respectively, with root mean square error under 0.2231%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2025-27029
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Animal Diversity and Health Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An efficient detection method for camel milk quality based on dielectric spectroscopy technology

Haonan Xue, Yifan Xia, Yang Liu, Jingchi Guo et al.
2 citations
Journal of Dairy Science
Animal Diversity and Health Studies
2.32
article

An efficient detection method for camel milk quality based on dielectric spectroscopy technology

Haonan Xue, Yifan Xia, Yang Liu, Jingchi Guo, Hong Zhang, Quan Xu, Qing Liang, Jikai Che
article en
2 citations

Abstract

To address the long-standing dual challenges in the camel milk industry, namely, the difficulty in identifying adulteration and the severe lag in nutritional component detection, this study analyzed the variation patterns of the dielectric constant (ε') and dielectric loss factor (ε") of camel milk fat, protein, and lactose. Based on the dielectric spectrum, detection models were constructed using partial least squares (PLS), convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory network (LSTM), CNN-LSTM, and an optimized CNN-LSTM fused with the Crested Porcupine Optimizer (CPO) and squeeze-and-excitation network (CPO-CNN-LSTM-SEN) for camel milk quality detection. The results indicate that across the 0.1 to 26.5 GHz frequency range, ε' exhibits a gradual decreasing trend with increasing frequency, and ε" demonstrates an initial decrease followed by an increase. Both ε' and ε" decrease with elevated fat, protein, and lactose content, showing strong negative correlations. Among CNN, LSTM, and CNN-LSTM, CNN-LSTM achieved optimal performance in discriminating camel milk adulteration with water and similar species milk (e.g., cow, goat, and mixed milk), attaining a 100% discrimination rate. Among PLS, CNN, LSTM, CNN-LSTM, and CPO-CNN-LSTM-SEN, CPO-CNN-LSTM-SEN performed the best in simultaneous quantitative determination of the 3 nutritional components of camel milk (fat, protein, and lactose). Its prediction set determination coefficients R<sub>P</sub><sup>2</sup> reached 0.9334, 0.9602, and 0.9703, respectively, with prediction set root mean square error below 0.1392%. Validation of the optimal CPO-CNN-LSTM-SEN model yielded R<sup>2</sup> values of 0.9186, 0.9507, and 0.9456, respectively, with root mean square error under 0.2231%.

Journal of Dairy ScienceVol. 108(10)
Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (CN), Tarim University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Animal Diversity and Health Studies
2.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.