Cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus coronary computed tomography angiography with fractional flow reserve for diagnosing obstructive coronary artery disease in higher risk patients: rationale and design of CONCORD—A prospective, single-center di

CONCORD will comprehensively evaluate two frontline non-invasive functional imaging modalities in patients with suspected angina and determine the comparative accuracy of CCTA/FFR<sub>CT</sub> and CMR in patients with a moderate-high risk of CAD. Evaluation of these strategies has the potential to inform both the quality and cost-effectiveness of imaging services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101939
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus coronary computed tomography angiography with fractional flow reserve for diagnosing obstructive coronary artery disease in higher risk patients: rationale and design of CONCORD—A prospective, single-center di

Robert Heggie, Joanne Wormleighton, Gaurav Singh Gulsin, Mohamed Elshibly et al.
1 citations
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
1.36
article

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus coronary computed tomography angiography with fractional flow reserve for diagnosing obstructive coronary artery disease in higher risk patients: rationale and design of CONCORD—A prospective, single-center di

Robert Heggie, Joanne Wormleighton, Gaurav Singh Gulsin, Mohamed Elshibly, Gerry P McCann, Andrew Ladwiniec, Olívia Wu, Kelly Parke, Alasdair McIntosh, Sandeep S Hothi, Peter Kellman, Alex McConnachie, Jayanth R. Arnold, Indrajeet Das, Rachel England, Simran Shergill
article en
1 citations

Abstract

CONCORD will comprehensively evaluate two frontline non-invasive functional imaging modalities in patients with suspected angina and determine the comparative accuracy of CCTA/FFR<sub>CT</sub> and CMR in patients with a moderate-high risk of CAD. Evaluation of these strategies has the potential to inform both the quality and cost-effectiveness of imaging services.

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceVol. 28(1)
National Institutes of Health (US), Glenfield Hospital (GB), University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (GB), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US), NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit (GB), The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust (GB), NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.