Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome Score–Physical function Short-form (HOOS-PS)

Chronic hip joint disease has a high prevalence in China, and the primary scale currently used to assess functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical Function Short-form (HOOS-PS). Therefore, our objective was to translate the HOOS-PS scale into Simplified Chinese and evaluate its reliability, validity, and responsiveness in THA patients. First, we followed the widely accepted cross-cultural translation process to translate the original HOOS-PS into the Chinese version of HOOS-PS (CHOOS-PS). Then, we recruited patients with chronic hip joint disease who were scheduled to undergo THA to complete the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and CHOOS-PS scales. Subsequently, we calculated the standardized response mean (SRM), effect size (ES), Spearman correlation coefficient (rs), standard error of measurement (SEM), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) based on the scale scores. Ultimately, 142, 138, and 109 patients completed the scale assessments at three stages. The results showed that CHOOS-PS has excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.848–0.919) and good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.892). The CHOOS-PS questionnaire demonstrated excellent correlation with the OHS scale (rs = 0.874), good correlation with all three subscales of the WOMAC (rs = 0.638–0.764), moderate to good correlation with the physical dimensions of the SF-36 (rs = 0.424–0.693), and poor to fair correlation with the mental dimensions of the SF-36 (rs = 0.165–0.319). The CFA results showed a good fit (root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.050, the comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.995, and the Tucher-Lewis Index (TLI) value = 0.991). These results indicate that the HOOS-PS scale has good construct validity. Additionally, CHOOS-PS showed good responsiveness (ES = 1.93, SRM = 1.88). The CHOOS-PS scale is a reliable tool for evaluating the functional outcomes of Chinese patients with chronic hip joint disease after THA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2025-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-09009-9
Primary Topic
Hip disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome Score–Physical function Short-form (HOOS-PS)

Mengyuan He, Haiyan Hu, Yingchao Tang, Lin Cui et al.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Hip disorders and treatments
article

Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome Score–Physical function Short-form (HOOS-PS)

Mengyuan He, Haiyan Hu, Yingchao Tang, Lin Cui, Qingyun Xie, Jianxiang Long, Dongfa Liao, Wei Wang, Lin Wu, Shihong Li, Li Yin, Benjing Song, Amuyida
article en

Abstract

Chronic hip joint disease has a high prevalence in China, and the primary scale currently used to assess functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical Function Short-form (HOOS-PS). Therefore, our objective was to translate the HOOS-PS scale into Simplified Chinese and evaluate its reliability, validity, and responsiveness in THA patients. First, we followed the widely accepted cross-cultural translation process to translate the original HOOS-PS into the Chinese version of HOOS-PS (CHOOS-PS). Then, we recruited patients with chronic hip joint disease who were scheduled to undergo THA to complete the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and CHOOS-PS scales. Subsequently, we calculated the standardized response mean (SRM), effect size (ES), Spearman correlation coefficient (rs), standard error of measurement (SEM), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) based on the scale scores. Ultimately, 142, 138, and 109 patients completed the scale assessments at three stages. The results showed that CHOOS-PS has excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.848–0.919) and good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.892). The CHOOS-PS questionnaire demonstrated excellent correlation with the OHS scale (rs = 0.874), good correlation with all three subscales of the WOMAC (rs = 0.638–0.764), moderate to good correlation with the physical dimensions of the SF-36 (rs = 0.424–0.693), and poor to fair correlation with the mental dimensions of the SF-36 (rs = 0.165–0.319). The CFA results showed a good fit (root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.050, the comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.995, and the Tucher-Lewis Index (TLI) value = 0.991). These results indicate that the HOOS-PS scale has good construct validity. Additionally, CHOOS-PS showed good responsiveness (ES = 1.93, SRM = 1.88). The CHOOS-PS scale is a reliable tool for evaluating the functional outcomes of Chinese patients with chronic hip joint disease after THA.

BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersVol. 26(1)
Chengdu Military General Hospital (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College (CN), Chongqing Emergency Medical Center (CN), Southwest Jiaotong University (CN)
Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Hip disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.