Potential Health Implications of Fifth Generation (5G) Wireless Communication Technology

Background: The implementation of global 5G wireless technology, having revolutionized telecommunications, has led to greatly increased speed and connectivity; however, there are concerns of potential health risks associated with exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF), particularly at the new 5G frequencies (3.5–100 GHz). This has caused much discussion globally. One can see the focus on concerns regarding some public issues and also scientific concerns, which cover thermal and non-thermal effects, carcinogenicity, and other potential impacts on neurological, reproductive, and immunological systems.Objective: To identify the research gaps around the potential health effects of 5G technology, the peer-reviewed literature was reviewed.Methods: A systematic review of literature was undertaken from the years 2010-2024, using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Search terms for the search included and were limited to “5G technology,” “RF-EMF,” and “health effects.” The studies reviewed evaluated health effects, were performed using human or animal models, and focused on targets related to 5G-specific frequencies. Review articles that were non-peer-reviewed were excluded from the review. A thematic analysis was conducted, with specific attention to biological and epidemiological findings.Results: Thermal effects of 5G are minimal and within safety margins, and they impact skin primarily. Non-thermal effects, such as oxidative stress, have inconsistent in vitro and in vivo findings. Epidemiological data on carcinogenicity are limited, with very few 5G-specific studies. Some reproductive and neurological impacts suggest a possibility of risk; however, the available data are not sufficient to reach a conclusion. Regulatory guidelines consider thermal impacts but may not stipulate exposure through similar non-thermal mechanisms. Conclusions: Although 5G appears to be safe within the parameters of regulatory guidelines, other consequences of 5G exposure in the long term and potential non-thermal exposure effects remain uncertain. Standard dosimetry and longitudinal studies are necessary to establish a course of research for public health risks, if any, from 5G.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Saudi Journal of Medicine and Public Health
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64483/jmph-53
Primary Topic
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potential Health Implications of Fifth Generation (5G) Wireless Communication Technology

Aymen M. Madkhali, Ali Al-Otaibi, Afaf Sarhan, Adel W. Almutairi et al.
Saudi Journal of Medicine and Public Health
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
article

Potential Health Implications of Fifth Generation (5G) Wireless Communication Technology

Aymen M. Madkhali, Ali Al-Otaibi, Afaf Sarhan, Adel W. Almutairi, Fahad Z. Alotaibi, Dalil Alshammari, Ebtisam Qaleel Hakem Alotaibi, Ghadeer Abdullah Alotaibi, Maytha saeed Almutairi, Imranah Marui Hassan Sharrahi, Hashima Ahmed Bouri, Thamer suliman Albalawi, Nasser Farih Abdullah Al-Anzi, Muneerah Obeid Abdulmohsen Al-Gharbi
article en

Abstract

Background: The implementation of global 5G wireless technology, having revolutionized telecommunications, has led to greatly increased speed and connectivity; however, there are concerns of potential health risks associated with exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF), particularly at the new 5G frequencies (3.5–100 GHz). This has caused much discussion globally. One can see the focus on concerns regarding some public issues and also scientific concerns, which cover thermal and non-thermal effects, carcinogenicity, and other potential impacts on neurological, reproductive, and immunological systems.Objective: To identify the research gaps around the potential health effects of 5G technology, the peer-reviewed literature was reviewed.Methods: A systematic review of literature was undertaken from the years 2010-2024, using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Search terms for the search included and were limited to “5G technology,” “RF-EMF,” and “health effects.” The studies reviewed evaluated health effects, were performed using human or animal models, and focused on targets related to 5G-specific frequencies. Review articles that were non-peer-reviewed were excluded from the review. A thematic analysis was conducted, with specific attention to biological and epidemiological findings.Results: Thermal effects of 5G are minimal and within safety margins, and they impact skin primarily. Non-thermal effects, such as oxidative stress, have inconsistent in vitro and in vivo findings. Epidemiological data on carcinogenicity are limited, with very few 5G-specific studies. Some reproductive and neurological impacts suggest a possibility of risk; however, the available data are not sufficient to reach a conclusion. Regulatory guidelines consider thermal impacts but may not stipulate exposure through similar non-thermal mechanisms. Conclusions: Although 5G appears to be safe within the parameters of regulatory guidelines, other consequences of 5G exposure in the long term and potential non-thermal exposure effects remain uncertain. Standard dosimetry and longitudinal studies are necessary to establish a course of research for public health risks, if any, from 5G.

Saudi Journal of Medicine and Public HealthVol. 1(1)
Northern Border University (SA), Saudi Electronic University (SA), Shaqra University (SA), King Fahd Medical City (SA), Maternity and Children's Hospital (SA), Primary Health Care (QA), Al-Farabi College (SA), Hera General Hospital (SA), King Khaled Hospital (SA), Bank of England (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.