Using a Random Forest Model to Combine Airborne Lidar and Snotel Data for Daily Estimates of Snow Depth Across Mountain Drainage Basins of Colorado

Abstract Machine learning (ML) has emerged as an effective tool for estimating snow depth and snow water equivalent at unsampled times and locations. Airborne lidar surveys are particularly useful for ML applications: the high‐resolution, high‐precision snow depth data allow for algorithm training and testing to an extent and spatial resolution not previously possible. Here, we train a random forest model to estimate snow depth relative to a nearby Snotel site using static physiographic data and dynamic (i.e., time‐dependent) snowpack data as predictor variables and lidar for the target variable. The model output is daily, 50 m resolution snow depth for basins that have both lidar and Snotel data in Colorado. We evaluated multiple approaches for random forest training: using historic lidar data in a basin (temporal transfer), using lidar data from other basins in a region (spatial transfer), and both together. The three approaches yield RMSE values ranging from 0.37 to 0.44 m at 50 m resolution, achieving lower errors compared to ML studies at higher resolutions. Model error decreases when outputs are upscaled, with RMSE values of 0.17 and 0.10 m for the 4 km and basin scales, respectively. The model scenario which includes both temporally and spatially transferred lidar data is the most robust to the number and timing of lidar surveys used in model training. This framework extends the spatial footprint of Snotel and the temporal coverage of lidar by leveraging the strengths of the two data sets, with applications for water resource management and validation of gridded snow products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources Research
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr039775
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using a Random Forest Model to Combine Airborne Lidar and Snotel Data for Daily Estimates of Snow Depth Across Mountain Drainage Basins of Colorado

Mark S. Raleigh, Jordan N. Herbert, Eric E. Small
2 citations
Water Resources Research
Cryospheric studies and observations
2.60
article

Using a Random Forest Model to Combine Airborne Lidar and Snotel Data for Daily Estimates of Snow Depth Across Mountain Drainage Basins of Colorado

Mark S. Raleigh, Jordan N. Herbert, Eric E. Small
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Machine learning (ML) has emerged as an effective tool for estimating snow depth and snow water equivalent at unsampled times and locations. Airborne lidar surveys are particularly useful for ML applications: the high‐resolution, high‐precision snow depth data allow for algorithm training and testing to an extent and spatial resolution not previously possible. Here, we train a random forest model to estimate snow depth relative to a nearby Snotel site using static physiographic data and dynamic (i.e., time‐dependent) snowpack data as predictor variables and lidar for the target variable. The model output is daily, 50 m resolution snow depth for basins that have both lidar and Snotel data in Colorado. We evaluated multiple approaches for random forest training: using historic lidar data in a basin (temporal transfer), using lidar data from other basins in a region (spatial transfer), and both together. The three approaches yield RMSE values ranging from 0.37 to 0.44 m at 50 m resolution, achieving lower errors compared to ML studies at higher resolutions. Model error decreases when outputs are upscaled, with RMSE values of 0.17 and 0.10 m for the 4 km and basin scales, respectively. The model scenario which includes both temporally and spatially transferred lidar data is the most robust to the number and timing of lidar surveys used in model training. This framework extends the spatial footprint of Snotel and the temporal coverage of lidar by leveraging the strengths of the two data sets, with applications for water resource management and validation of gridded snow products.

Water Resources ResearchVol. 61(8)
Oregon State University (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Bureau of Reclamation, Earth Sciences Division
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cryospheric studies and observations
2.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.