Corporate Personification: A Mind/Body Metaphor Guides Blame for Organizational Wrongdoing

In cases of corporate wrongdoing, it is difficult to assign blame across multiple agents who played different roles. We propose that people metaphorize corporations and have dualist ideas of corporate hierarchies, with the boss as “the mind” and the employee as “the body” such that the employee appears to carry out the will of the boss. Three experiments tested whether people judge the boss to be more responsible and causally efficacious when the metaphor is made relatively more (vs. less) apt. We tested this by varying features of a boss giving orders to an employee consistent with features that bolster the sense that an individual's will causes their actions. This work suggests that the same features that tell us our minds cause our actions also facilitate the metaphor that a boss has willed the behavior of an employee and is ultimately responsible for bad outcomes in the workplace.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Cognition
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2025.43.4.356
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate Personification: A Mind/Body Metaphor Guides Blame for Organizational Wrongdoing

Grace Flores‐Robles, Ana P. Gantman, Nirupika Sharma
Social Cognition
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Corporate Personification: A Mind/Body Metaphor Guides Blame for Organizational Wrongdoing

Grace Flores‐Robles, Ana P. Gantman, Nirupika Sharma
article en

Abstract

In cases of corporate wrongdoing, it is difficult to assign blame across multiple agents who played different roles. We propose that people metaphorize corporations and have dualist ideas of corporate hierarchies, with the boss as “the mind” and the employee as “the body” such that the employee appears to carry out the will of the boss. Three experiments tested whether people judge the boss to be more responsible and causally efficacious when the metaphor is made relatively more (vs. less) apt. We tested this by varying features of a boss giving orders to an employee consistent with features that bolster the sense that an individual's will causes their actions. This work suggests that the same features that tell us our minds cause our actions also facilitate the metaphor that a boss has willed the behavior of an employee and is ultimately responsible for bad outcomes in the workplace.

Social CognitionVol. 43(4)
City University of New York (US), New York City College of Technology (US), Brooklyn College (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.