Accelerated 3D qCEST of the Spine in a Porcine Model Using MR Multitasking at 3T
To assess lower back pain using quantitative chemical exchange saturation transfer (qCEST) imaging in a porcine model by comparing exchange rate maps obtained from multitasking qCEST with conventional qCEST. Use a permuted random forest (PRF) model trained on CEST-derived magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) and exchange rate (k<sub>sw</sub>) features to predict Glasgow pain scores. Six Yucatan minipigs were scanned at baseline and at four post-injury time points (weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16) following intervertebral disc injury. Conventional qCEST imaging was performed at four B1 powers using a two-dimensional reduced field of view turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequence, with a total acquisition time of 24 min per slice. Multitasking steady-state (SS) CEST imaging was performed with pulsed saturation to achieve a steady state, acquiring 32 slices at 59 offsets for 4 B1 powers in 36 min. Exchange rate maps were generated using omega plot analysis, and CEST images were analyzed using a multi-pool fitting model to produce MTR and k<sub>sw</sub> maps. Permuted random forest (PRF) model was trained on MTR and k<sub>sw</sub> values to predict pain scores. Modic changes were assessed using T2-weighted MR images. The Pearson correlation coefficient between exchange rate maps from multitasking qCEST and conventional qCEST was 0.82, demonstrating strong agreement. The 3D qCEST (SS-CEST) technique effectively differentiated between healthy and injured discs, with injured discs exhibiting significantly higher k<sub>sw</sub> values. Using MTR and k<sub>sw</sub>, the PRF model achieved 80% accuracy in predicting pain scores disc-by-disc, outperforming the correlation with Modic changes (r = 0.45, p < 0.05); with a Cohen's Kappa of 0.4. 3D steady-state qCEST with whole-spine coverage can be done at 3T within 32 min using MR Multitasking (acceleration factor of 22), and qCEST-derived biomarkers (MTR and k<sub>sw</sub>) can predict pain scores with an accuracy of 80%.
Authors
- Yibin Xie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0333-567X)
- Jacob T. Wechsler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0770-4801)
- Chushu Shen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5865-4754)
- Hsu‐Lei Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5509-5199)
- Pablo Avalos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5313-5334)
- Melissa Chavez
- Giselle Kaneda (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0547-9060)
- Karandeep Cheema (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0035-1117)
- Dmitriy Sheyn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3333-1485)
- Wafa Tawackoli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3742-8644)
- Debiao Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8560-8231)
- Anthony Christodoulou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9334-8684)
- Candace L. Floyd (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3368-2039)
Institutions
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
- Emory University (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of California System (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- NMR in Biomedicine
- Published
- 2025-08-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.70122
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.72
Funders
- National Institutes of Health