Evaluating Reporting Completeness in Oral Health Clinical Guidelines: A Meta-Research Study
Reporting completeness in dental/oral CPGs is suboptimal and is associated with the journal's quartile and guideline endorsement. Increasing awareness of CPG reporting guidelines and ensuring their rigorous application are decisive toward better adherence.Knowledge Transfer Statement:The quality of reporting in dental and oral clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is low and linked to the journal's impact factor and the endorsement of the guidelines. Enhancing knowledge of CPG reporting guidelines and implementing them rigorously are critical for improved adherence.
Authors
- Gustavo G. Nascimento (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4288-6300)
- Patrícia Lyra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6804-9124)
- Vanessa Machado (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2503-260X)
- José João Mendes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0167-4077)
- João Botelho (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1019-8263)
- Pierre-Jean Lancry
Institutions
- Escola Superior de Saúde Egas Moniz (PT)
- Duke-NUS Medical School (SG)
- National Dental Centre of Singapore (SG)
Publication Details
- Journal
- JDR Clinical & Translational Research
- Published
- 2025-08-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/23800844251357235
- Primary Topic
- Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00