Letting Work What Works—Effectively Preventing Juvenile Delinquency in the Netherlands: A Meta-Analysis of the Evidence
This meta-analysis evaluated judicial interventions for juvenile delinquency certified by the Netherlands Youth Institute with "initial indications" for effectiveness. Ten (quasi-)experimental studies examining TOOLS4U, Multidimensional Family Therapy (MDFT), Multi Systemic Therapy (MST), Only You Decide who you Are (OYD), Responsive Social Skills Therapy (Re-SST), and Responsive Aggression Regulation Therapy (Re-ART) were synthesized. The overall effect was small, positive, and significant (<i>g</i> = 0.22; 95%CI: 0.02, 0.42). Responsive cognitive behavioral therapy (Re-SST and Re-ART) and the sports-based intervention OYD seem effective, whereas social skills training (TOOLS4U) and family-based systemic interventions (MDFT and MST) seem ineffective. However, effectiveness of family-based programs can possibly be enhanced if youth at medium-to-high risk for delinquency is treated for 6 months or longer, which aligns with the Risk-Need-Responsivity model. Better program delivery and general instead of specific offenses were associated with larger effects. We advocate a stronger evidence-based RNR approach to juvenile delinquency in the Netherlands.
Authors
- Evelyn Heynen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4969-8986)
- Mark Assink (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2235-6548)
- P Ter Meulen
- Naomi Koning (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8698-6023)
- Emile Kolthoff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3115-5382)
- Susan van Hooren
Institutions
- Zuyd University of Applied Sciences (NL)
- Netherlands Youth Institute (NL)
- Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
- Published
- 2025-08-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x251344620
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.61