Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donors' Experiences of Information and Side‐Effects During the First Year After Donation—A Swedish National Study

The aim was to describe hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors' experiences focusing on information and side effects during the first year after donation. Our prospective Swedish cohort study with adult HSC donors was performed from 2019 to 2022, with questionnaires at four time points from before until 12 months after donation. 173 unrelated and 68 related donors participated, and the majority donated peripheral blood stem cells. All but one rated their donation experience as good or very good. At least one side effect was reported by 83% of participants. Six donors (2.5%) experienced either numerous side effects, at least one severe side effect, or prolonged side effects. Satisfaction with information was lower among donors having severe side effects and bone marrow donors. Overall satisfaction with the donation was lower among donors having severe side effects and unrelated donors. Donors were generally satisfied with the pre-donation information. Most experienced side effects that resolved within 2 weeks, which strengthens the case for unchanged donor follow-up 1 month after donation, with individualized follow-up for donors with persistent symptoms. Enhanced information regarding the risk of more severe or prolonged side effects appears warranted, and its effect on donor satisfaction should be evaluated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Apheresis
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jca.70050
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donors' Experiences of Information and Side‐Effects During the First Year After Donation—A Swedish National Study

Gunnar Larfors, Simon Pahnke, Annika Kisch, Jeanette Winterling et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Apheresis
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
3.54
article

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donors' Experiences of Information and Side‐Effects During the First Year After Donation—A Swedish National Study

Gunnar Larfors, Simon Pahnke, Annika Kisch, Jeanette Winterling, Hans Hägglund, Stig Lenhoff
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The aim was to describe hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors' experiences focusing on information and side effects during the first year after donation. Our prospective Swedish cohort study with adult HSC donors was performed from 2019 to 2022, with questionnaires at four time points from before until 12 months after donation. 173 unrelated and 68 related donors participated, and the majority donated peripheral blood stem cells. All but one rated their donation experience as good or very good. At least one side effect was reported by 83% of participants. Six donors (2.5%) experienced either numerous side effects, at least one severe side effect, or prolonged side effects. Satisfaction with information was lower among donors having severe side effects and bone marrow donors. Overall satisfaction with the donation was lower among donors having severe side effects and unrelated donors. Donors were generally satisfied with the pre-donation information. Most experienced side effects that resolved within 2 weeks, which strengthens the case for unchanged donor follow-up 1 month after donation, with individualized follow-up for donors with persistent symptoms. Enhanced information regarding the risk of more severe or prolonged side effects appears warranted, and its effect on donor satisfaction should be evaluated.

Journal of Clinical ApheresisVol. 40(4)
Uppsala University (SE), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Uppsala University Hospital (SE), Lund University (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Department of Medical Sciences (RU), Skåne University Hospital (SE), Cancer Genetics (United States) (US)
Cancerfonden
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
3.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.