Evaluating pregnancy termination rates for fetal chromosome and single gene disorders

We report pregnancy termination rates following a variety of fetal diagnoses and determine which factors may influence this decision. We conducted a retrospective chart review of pregnancies diagnosed with a genetic abnormality at a single institution from January 2012 to April 2023. The type of diagnosis, termination status, and thirteen demographic factors were collected. The primary outcome assessed was whether or not an individual terminated the pregnancy. Data analysis consisted of multivariable logistic regression. Of the 2120 patients who underwent prenatal diagnostic testing, 332 received a fetal diagnosis and met inclusion criteria. The overall termination rate was 61.5% (204/332). Compared with sex chromosome abnormalities, trisomy 18/trisomy 13/triploidy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 6.35, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.93-20.90) and trisomy 21 (aOR 4.39, 95% CI 1.58-12.24) had higher odds to terminate, while likely benign copy number variants (CNVs) (aOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.99) had lower odds to terminate. Black paternal race and ethnicity had a lower termination rate (aOR 0.08, 95% CI 0.03-0.23) compared to White counterparts. Earlier gestational age at diagnosis was associated with higher odds of termination (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78-0.90). This study demonstrates that termination rates varied by type of fetal diagnosis. Paternal race and ethnicity, as well as gestational age at diagnosis, also impacted the decision to terminate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.70099
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating pregnancy termination rates for fetal chromosome and single gene disorders

Shama Khan, Emily B. Rosenfeld, Elena Ashkinadze, Gary A. Heiman et al.
1 citations
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
3.49
article

Evaluating pregnancy termination rates for fetal chromosome and single gene disorders

Shama Khan, Emily B. Rosenfeld, Elena Ashkinadze, Gary A. Heiman, Marta Herman, Nicole Kasatkin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We report pregnancy termination rates following a variety of fetal diagnoses and determine which factors may influence this decision. We conducted a retrospective chart review of pregnancies diagnosed with a genetic abnormality at a single institution from January 2012 to April 2023. The type of diagnosis, termination status, and thirteen demographic factors were collected. The primary outcome assessed was whether or not an individual terminated the pregnancy. Data analysis consisted of multivariable logistic regression. Of the 2120 patients who underwent prenatal diagnostic testing, 332 received a fetal diagnosis and met inclusion criteria. The overall termination rate was 61.5% (204/332). Compared with sex chromosome abnormalities, trisomy 18/trisomy 13/triploidy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 6.35, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.93-20.90) and trisomy 21 (aOR 4.39, 95% CI 1.58-12.24) had higher odds to terminate, while likely benign copy number variants (CNVs) (aOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.99) had lower odds to terminate. Black paternal race and ethnicity had a lower termination rate (aOR 0.08, 95% CI 0.03-0.23) compared to White counterparts. Earlier gestational age at diagnosis was associated with higher odds of termination (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78-0.90). This study demonstrates that termination rates varied by type of fetal diagnosis. Paternal race and ethnicity, as well as gestational age at diagnosis, also impacted the decision to terminate.

Journal of Genetic CounselingVol. 34(4)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Johnson University (US), Lancaster General Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.