Letter contrast sensitivity validation

Overall, the computerised letter method for assessing CS function was highly repeatable and had significantly lower test variance when compared with either of the sinusoidal instruments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Published
2025-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13555
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Letter contrast sensitivity validation

Rajaraman Suryakumar, Michel Guillon, Pasquale Pepe, Jessie Hull
1 citations
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
1.43
article

Letter contrast sensitivity validation

Rajaraman Suryakumar, Michel Guillon, Pasquale Pepe, Jessie Hull
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Overall, the computerised letter method for assessing CS function was highly repeatable and had significantly lower test variance when compared with either of the sinusoidal instruments.

Ophthalmic and Physiological OpticsVol. 45(6)
Alcon (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
1.43
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Letter contrast sensitivity validation — Rajaraman Suryakumar, Michel Guillon, et al. · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS