Effects of open-label placebos across populations and outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
This work synthesizes and updates findings from previous systematic-reviews and meta-analyses on open-label placebos (OLPs). For the first time, it directly tests whether OLPs differ in effects between clinical and non-clinical samples, and between self-report and objective outcomes. We searched eight databases up to November 9, 2023, and included 60 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), compromising 63 separate comparisons. OLPs yielded a small positive effect across various health-related outcomes (k = 63, n = 4554, SMD = 0.35, CI 95% = 0.26; 0.44, p < 0.0001, I<sup>2</sup> = 53%). The effect differed between clinical (k = 24, n = 1383, SMD = 0.47) and non-clinical samples (k = 39, n = 3171, SMD = 0.29; Q = 4.25, p < 0.05), as well as between self-reported (k = 55, n = 3919, SMD = 0.39) and objective outcomes (k = 17, n = 1250, SMD = 0.09; Q = 7.24, p < 0.01). Neithter the level of suggestiveness nor the type of control moderated the effect. These findings confirm that OLPs are effective for both clinical and non-clinical samples-particularly when effects are assessed via self-reports.
Authors
- Jens Gaab (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9194-8491)
- Johannes C. Fendel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3852-5422)
- Stefan Schmidt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4858-4220)
- Carl Tiersch
- Paul Sölder
Institutions
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- University of Basel (CH)
- University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2025-08-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14895-z
- Citations
- 6
- Primary Topic
- Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 8.59