3 Tesla stack-of-stars echo unbalanced T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state MRI for brain tumor imaging: post-contrast comparison with MPRAGE

This study compared the image quality and diagnostic utility of stack-of-stars echo-unbalanced T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state (SOS echo-uT1RESS) with the widely used magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) sequence in brain tumor imaging. In this prospective, two-center observational study, each participant underwent 3T contrast-enhanced MRI of the brain with both standard MPRAGE and prototype SOS echo-uT1RESS sequences. Lesion size, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and tumor-to-brain contrast were quantitatively analyzed. Overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, and image artifacts were scored on a 4-point Likert scale, while diagnostic performance and assessment of the vascular and dural involvement were compared side-by-side by three readers. Thirty-four adult patients (mean age, 64 years ± 13 [SD], 12 men) with known brain tumors (N = 6 intra-axial primary tumors; N = 14 intra-axial metastases; N = 14 extra-axial tumors) were enrolled in this study. There was no significant difference in CNR between MPRAGE and SOS echo-uT1RESS (29.4 ± 21.4 vs. 28.2 ± 16.5, respectively; p = 0.80, r = 0.03). SOS echo-uT1RESS demonstrated a 1.8-fold improvement in tumor-to-brain contrast compared with MPRAGE (0.7 ± 0.4 vs. 0.4 ± 0.3, respectively; p < 0.001, r = 0.81). While overall image quality and image artifacts were similar for both sequences, SOS echo-uT1RESS showed improved lesion conspicuity (p < 0.001, r = 0.51) and improved diagnostic performance (p < 0.001, r = 0.53), particularly for small metastases. SOS echo-uT1RESS enhanced lesion visibility, achieving approximately a 1.8-fold improvement in tumor-to-brain contrast compared to MPRAGE, although this finding may reflect both sequence properties and timing-related effects. The sequence maintained comparable overall image quality and robustness, making it a promising tool for brain tumor imaging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Imaging
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-025-00924-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3 Tesla stack-of-stars echo unbalanced T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state MRI for brain tumor imaging: post-contrast comparison with MPRAGE

Ákos Varga‐Szemes, Jennifer Joyce, Kai Tobias Block, Dmitrij Kravchenko et al.
1 citations
Cancer Imaging
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
1.36
article

3 Tesla stack-of-stars echo unbalanced T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state MRI for brain tumor imaging: post-contrast comparison with MPRAGE

Ákos Varga‐Szemes, Jennifer Joyce, Kai Tobias Block, Dmitrij Kravchenko, Ruoxun Zi, Justin Chetta, Maria Vittoria Spampinato, Adrienn Tóth, Robert R. Edelman, James Ira Griggers
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study compared the image quality and diagnostic utility of stack-of-stars echo-unbalanced T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state (SOS echo-uT1RESS) with the widely used magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) sequence in brain tumor imaging. In this prospective, two-center observational study, each participant underwent 3T contrast-enhanced MRI of the brain with both standard MPRAGE and prototype SOS echo-uT1RESS sequences. Lesion size, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and tumor-to-brain contrast were quantitatively analyzed. Overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, and image artifacts were scored on a 4-point Likert scale, while diagnostic performance and assessment of the vascular and dural involvement were compared side-by-side by three readers. Thirty-four adult patients (mean age, 64 years ± 13 [SD], 12 men) with known brain tumors (N = 6 intra-axial primary tumors; N = 14 intra-axial metastases; N = 14 extra-axial tumors) were enrolled in this study. There was no significant difference in CNR between MPRAGE and SOS echo-uT1RESS (29.4 ± 21.4 vs. 28.2 ± 16.5, respectively; p = 0.80, r = 0.03). SOS echo-uT1RESS demonstrated a 1.8-fold improvement in tumor-to-brain contrast compared with MPRAGE (0.7 ± 0.4 vs. 0.4 ± 0.3, respectively; p < 0.001, r = 0.81). While overall image quality and image artifacts were similar for both sequences, SOS echo-uT1RESS showed improved lesion conspicuity (p < 0.001, r = 0.51) and improved diagnostic performance (p < 0.001, r = 0.53), particularly for small metastases. SOS echo-uT1RESS enhanced lesion visibility, achieving approximately a 1.8-fold improvement in tumor-to-brain contrast compared to MPRAGE, although this finding may reflect both sequence properties and timing-related effects. The sequence maintained comparable overall image quality and robustness, making it a promising tool for brain tumor imaging.

Cancer ImagingVol. 25(1)
Semmelweis University (HU), Northwestern University (US), NorthShore University HealthSystem (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US), New York University (US)
Semmelweis Egyetem
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.