The haves and the have‐nots: Identifying typologies of change in relative deprivation using multi‐trajectory latent class growth analysis

Relative deprivation theory argues that individuals can perceive themselves to be deprived relative to other individuals (IRD) or that their ingroup is deprived relative to other groups (GRD). Few studies, however, investigate how these distinct 'types' of relative deprivation manifest over time. We address this oversight using multi-trajectory latent class growth analysis to identify distinct growth trajectories of relative deprivation across 13 annual waves of a nationwide longitudinal panel study (2011-2023; N<sub>total</sub> = 75,073). We identified two discrete classes: the Content class (90.5% of the sample) and the Deprived class (9.5%). Whereas the Content class had low levels of IRD and GRD that declined over 12 years, the Deprived class had moderate levels of IRD that decreased but high levels of GRD that increased over time. Membership in these two classes differed across demographics, well-being and sociopolitical measures. The implications for relative deprivation theory are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Social Psychology
Published
2025-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.70009
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The haves and the have‐nots: Identifying typologies of change in relative deprivation using multi‐trajectory latent class growth analysis

Danny Osborne, Kieren J. Lilly, Chris G. Sibley
2 citations
British Journal of Social Psychology
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
8.40
article

The haves and the have‐nots: Identifying typologies of change in relative deprivation using multi‐trajectory latent class growth analysis

Danny Osborne, Kieren J. Lilly, Chris G. Sibley
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Relative deprivation theory argues that individuals can perceive themselves to be deprived relative to other individuals (IRD) or that their ingroup is deprived relative to other groups (GRD). Few studies, however, investigate how these distinct 'types' of relative deprivation manifest over time. We address this oversight using multi-trajectory latent class growth analysis to identify distinct growth trajectories of relative deprivation across 13 annual waves of a nationwide longitudinal panel study (2011-2023; N<sub>total</sub> = 75,073). We identified two discrete classes: the Content class (90.5% of the sample) and the Deprived class (9.5%). Whereas the Content class had low levels of IRD and GRD that declined over 12 years, the Deprived class had moderate levels of IRD that decreased but high levels of GRD that increased over time. Membership in these two classes differed across demographics, well-being and sociopolitical measures. The implications for relative deprivation theory are discussed.

British Journal of Social PsychologyVol. 64(4)
University of Auckland (NZ), The University of Queensland (AU)
University of Auckland, Templeton Religion Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The haves and the have‐nots: Identifying typologies of change in relative deprivation using multi‐trajectory latent class growth analysis — Danny Osborne, Kieren J. Lilly, et al. · British Journal of Social Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS