Diverging associations of traditional versus social media with government trust

Abstract Trust in government and institutions is a cornerstone of functioning representative democracies. While previous research documented negative associations between social media use as a news source and institutional trust, temporal dynamics and even basic moderating factors remain underexplored. We aim to contribute evidence on these issues by asking: How is the media use-trust association shaped by moderators like traditional media use, age and partisanship, and does it have a time component? For this, we analyze a unique comparative dataset comprising 20 representative panel waves in the United States and Germany, each consisting of at least 1500 participants (totaling in N = 16,679 in the US, N = 11,277 in Germany). We find that associations of trust and social media use are crucially moderated by traditional media use, particularly for younger people. In Germany, evidence from our specific survey structure suggests that lower trust temporally precedes higher social media use, a relationship that has not been documented before. At the same time, media use patterns differ between opposition and government party supporters, and these differences increase with age. Further, associations of social media use and government distrust are most pronounced among older participants and opposition supporters. A deeper understanding of these dynamics and heterogeneities is essential for democracies worldwide, particularly in the context of increasing social media use.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-08323-4
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diverging associations of traditional versus social media with government trust

Jonas Fegert, Philipp Lorenz-Spreen, David Borukhson
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Social Media and Politics
article

Diverging associations of traditional versus social media with government trust

Jonas Fegert, Philipp Lorenz-Spreen, David Borukhson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Trust in government and institutions is a cornerstone of functioning representative democracies. While previous research documented negative associations between social media use as a news source and institutional trust, temporal dynamics and even basic moderating factors remain underexplored. We aim to contribute evidence on these issues by asking: How is the media use-trust association shaped by moderators like traditional media use, age and partisanship, and does it have a time component? For this, we analyze a unique comparative dataset comprising 20 representative panel waves in the United States and Germany, each consisting of at least 1500 participants (totaling in N = 16,679 in the US, N = 11,277 in Germany). We find that associations of trust and social media use are crucially moderated by traditional media use, particularly for younger people. In Germany, evidence from our specific survey structure suggests that lower trust temporally precedes higher social media use, a relationship that has not been documented before. At the same time, media use patterns differ between opposition and government party supporters, and these differences increase with age. Further, associations of social media use and government distrust are most pronounced among older participants and opposition supporters. A deeper understanding of these dynamics and heterogeneities is essential for democracies worldwide, particularly in the context of increasing social media use.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 13(1)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.