Analysis of financial growth in manufacturing companies across three Nordic countries

The three Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, and Sweden) have long enjoyed economic success in manufacturing and innovation. All of these countries have small domestic markets and depend on international trade. Before the Global Financial Crisis (GFC; 2008–2009), Finland and Sweden set the standards, but since the GFC, Denmark has performed particularly well, while Sweden has had a mediocre performance. Growth is evident not only in revenues but also in profits and asset amounts. This growth has been consistent across many companies and has followed a linear pattern. Finland has generally performed worse than the other two countries, with issues mostly associated with lower revenue and profit growth, and changes in assets. Finland lacks companies with consistent growth. A key difference from Denmark is the smaller presence of the healthcare sector. The present analysis indicated that consistent growth is required to achieve the desired results using the current measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2025.1629810
Primary Topic
Firm Innovation and Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of financial growth in manufacturing companies across three Nordic countries

Olli‐Pekka Hilmola, Per Hilletofth, Daniella Fjellström
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
Firm Innovation and Growth
article

Analysis of financial growth in manufacturing companies across three Nordic countries

Olli‐Pekka Hilmola, Per Hilletofth, Daniella Fjellström
article en

Abstract

The three Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, and Sweden) have long enjoyed economic success in manufacturing and innovation. All of these countries have small domestic markets and depend on international trade. Before the Global Financial Crisis (GFC; 2008–2009), Finland and Sweden set the standards, but since the GFC, Denmark has performed particularly well, while Sweden has had a mediocre performance. Growth is evident not only in revenues but also in profits and asset amounts. This growth has been consistent across many companies and has followed a linear pattern. Finland has generally performed worse than the other two countries, with issues mostly associated with lower revenue and profit growth, and changes in assets. Finland lacks companies with consistent growth. A key difference from Denmark is the smaller presence of the healthcare sector. The present analysis indicated that consistent growth is required to achieve the desired results using the current measures.

Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and StatisticsVol. 11
Tallinn University of Technology (EE), Estonian Academy of Sciences (EE), University of Gävle (SE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Firm Innovation and Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.