Durable response to venetoclax, azacytidine, and ruxolitinib in chronic-phase myelofibrosis resistant to ruxolitinib: a case report and literature review

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a philadelphia chromosome-negative chronic myeloprolifera- tive neoplasm.It has a worse prognosis than polycythemia vera and essential thrombocy- themia.At present,both Chinese and foreign guidelines recommend ruxolitinib as first-line treatment for IPSS/DIPSS/DIPSS-Plus patients with splenomegaly in intermediate-risk-2 and high-risk MF-CP.However,long-term follow-up revealed possible increase in the discontinuation rate of ruxolitinib due to drug resistance and other reasons with the prolongation of the treatment duration. At this study,it imposes a great challenge for clinical management owing to the lack of standard treatment for patients who have lost efficacy due to drug resistance,and the absence of subsequent treatment strategies. Significantly, venetoclax combined with azacytidine, with or without the use of ruxolitinib, was reported to be effective and safe for patients in MF-accelerated/acute phase.Here, we report a case of MF-CP patient who was unresponsive to ruxolitinib, with therapeutic response after applying venetoclax and azacytidine in combination with ruxolitinib. After treatment, the patient showed improved condition. After two courses of treatment with venetoclax and azacytidine combined with ruxolitinib, the patient has been continuously treated with oral ruxolitinib and has achieved a therapeutic effect for more than 1 year. The treatment response of this patient we reported provides a new safe and effective treatment method for MF-CP patients who are no longer responsive to ruxolitinib.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1644661
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Durable response to venetoclax, azacytidine, and ruxolitinib in chronic-phase myelofibrosis resistant to ruxolitinib: a case report and literature review

Xiu Juan Zhang, Hongxia Shi, Xiaohong Liu
1 citations
Frontiers in Oncology
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
1.63
article

Durable response to venetoclax, azacytidine, and ruxolitinib in chronic-phase myelofibrosis resistant to ruxolitinib: a case report and literature review

Xiu Juan Zhang, Hongxia Shi, Xiaohong Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a philadelphia chromosome-negative chronic myeloprolifera- tive neoplasm.It has a worse prognosis than polycythemia vera and essential thrombocy- themia.At present,both Chinese and foreign guidelines recommend ruxolitinib as first-line treatment for IPSS/DIPSS/DIPSS-Plus patients with splenomegaly in intermediate-risk-2 and high-risk MF-CP.However,long-term follow-up revealed possible increase in the discontinuation rate of ruxolitinib due to drug resistance and other reasons with the prolongation of the treatment duration. At this study,it imposes a great challenge for clinical management owing to the lack of standard treatment for patients who have lost efficacy due to drug resistance,and the absence of subsequent treatment strategies. Significantly, venetoclax combined with azacytidine, with or without the use of ruxolitinib, was reported to be effective and safe for patients in MF-accelerated/acute phase.Here, we report a case of MF-CP patient who was unresponsive to ruxolitinib, with therapeutic response after applying venetoclax and azacytidine in combination with ruxolitinib. After treatment, the patient showed improved condition. After two courses of treatment with venetoclax and azacytidine combined with ruxolitinib, the patient has been continuously treated with oral ruxolitinib and has achieved a therapeutic effect for more than 1 year. The treatment response of this patient we reported provides a new safe and effective treatment method for MF-CP patients who are no longer responsive to ruxolitinib.

Frontiers in OncologyVol. 15
Peking University (CN), Peking University People's Hospital (CN), People's Hospital of Yangzhong (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Durable response to venetoclax, azacytidine, and ruxolitinib in chronic-phase myelofibrosis resistant to ruxolitinib: a case report and literature review — Xiu Juan Zhang, Hongxia Shi, et al. · Frontiers in Oncology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS