Differentiating Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Data Mining

The terms Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), Deep Learning (DL), and Data Mining (DM) are frequently used interchangeably across academic, regulatory, and industrial domains, despite having distinct conceptual foundations. This ambiguity hinders methodological consistency, regulatory alignment, and interdisciplinary collaboration. This study conducts a systematic overview of literature, including academic texts and regulatory standards from ISO, IEEE, NIST, and the European Commission, to clarify these terms and their relationships. A thematic analysis supports the synthesize of the existing definitions that structures AI as the broadest domain, encompassing ML and DL, while DM is framed as a process that intersects with but remains distinct from AI. The taxonomy is visualized through comparative matrices and hierarchical diagrams, reflecting differences in emphasis across disciplines. Although primarily conceptual, the study provides a foundation for harmonizing terminology and reducing fragmentation in AI-related research and policy discourse. Future work can focus on empirical validation through real-world case studies to assess its practical applicability and adoption challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/i2cacis65476.2025.11100436
Primary Topic
Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differentiating Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Data Mining

Richard T.K. Wong, Bayan Issa, Hui Na Chua, Muhammed Basheer Jasser
Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
article

Differentiating Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Data Mining

Richard T.K. Wong, Bayan Issa, Hui Na Chua, Muhammed Basheer Jasser
article en

Abstract

The terms Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), Deep Learning (DL), and Data Mining (DM) are frequently used interchangeably across academic, regulatory, and industrial domains, despite having distinct conceptual foundations. This ambiguity hinders methodological consistency, regulatory alignment, and interdisciplinary collaboration. This study conducts a systematic overview of literature, including academic texts and regulatory standards from ISO, IEEE, NIST, and the European Commission, to clarify these terms and their relationships. A thematic analysis supports the synthesize of the existing definitions that structures AI as the broadest domain, encompassing ML and DL, while DM is framed as a process that intersects with but remains distinct from AI. The taxonomy is visualized through comparative matrices and hierarchical diagrams, reflecting differences in emphasis across disciplines. Although primarily conceptual, the study provides a foundation for harmonizing terminology and reducing fragmentation in AI-related research and policy discourse. Future work can focus on empirical validation through real-world case studies to assess its practical applicability and adoption challenges.

University of Aleppo (SY), Sunway University (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.