Live data forensic tool testbed: Proof of concept

Live Data Forensics (LDF) has become a vital means of gathering digital evidence in criminal investigation. Due to advances in technology it is no longer sufficient to merely pull-the-plug instead many systems are analysed while running. However, this means that the evidence that will be relied upon in court is being changed as the LDF techniques are employed. This breaks the fundamental principle of forensics i.e. do not change the evidence. There are certain circumstances in which it is allowed to alter evidence but in these cases the practitioner must be able to explain the implication of their actions. As we are unable to determine how much information changes during LDF it is not possible to fully report the implications. This paper focuses on the topic of memory forensics and its importance in digital investigations in the context of the evaluation of LDF tools and their footprints. This paper introduces a simulated proof of concept testbed environment which demonstrates the possibility of validating and evaluating the performance of LDF tools. This is achieved through the development of a simulated processor which logs all alterations to memory as they occur. In parallel this paper introduces a specialised instruction set which can be used to trace the execution of the forensic process through RAM. The combination of these allows for the validation of RAM acquisition tools and the determination of the footprint of all LDF tools. The combination of these will, if fully implemented in the future, allow for the comparison of LDF tools in terms of the least impactful on the underlying evidential data. This will in turn lead to better understanding of the consequences of LDF actions and in turn more reliable evidence being available in court. • Creation of a simulator, ISA and assembler for LDF tool evaluation. • Development of a proof of concept simulation for LDF tool evaluation. • Development of an analysis tool. • Description of a method by which real-world LDF tools may be evaluated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forensic Science International Digital Investigation
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2025.301973
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Live data forensic tool testbed: Proof of concept

Fergus Toolan, Paul Stephens, Georgina Humphries, Ulf Bergum
Forensic Science International Digital Investigation
Digital and Cyber Forensics
article

Live data forensic tool testbed: Proof of concept

Fergus Toolan, Paul Stephens, Georgina Humphries, Ulf Bergum
article en

Abstract

Live Data Forensics (LDF) has become a vital means of gathering digital evidence in criminal investigation. Due to advances in technology it is no longer sufficient to merely pull-the-plug instead many systems are analysed while running. However, this means that the evidence that will be relied upon in court is being changed as the LDF techniques are employed. This breaks the fundamental principle of forensics i.e. do not change the evidence. There are certain circumstances in which it is allowed to alter evidence but in these cases the practitioner must be able to explain the implication of their actions. As we are unable to determine how much information changes during LDF it is not possible to fully report the implications. This paper focuses on the topic of memory forensics and its importance in digital investigations in the context of the evaluation of LDF tools and their footprints. This paper introduces a simulated proof of concept testbed environment which demonstrates the possibility of validating and evaluating the performance of LDF tools. This is achieved through the development of a simulated processor which logs all alterations to memory as they occur. In parallel this paper introduces a specialised instruction set which can be used to trace the execution of the forensic process through RAM. The combination of these allows for the validation of RAM acquisition tools and the determination of the footprint of all LDF tools. The combination of these will, if fully implemented in the future, allow for the comparison of LDF tools in terms of the least impactful on the underlying evidential data. This will in turn lead to better understanding of the consequences of LDF actions and in turn more reliable evidence being available in court. • Creation of a simulator, ISA and assembler for LDF tool evaluation. • Development of a proof of concept simulation for LDF tool evaluation. • Development of an analysis tool. • Description of a method by which real-world LDF tools may be evaluated.

Forensic Science International Digital InvestigationVol. 54
Canterbury Christ Church University (GB), Norwegian Police University College (NO), University of East London (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.