Impacts of the CICE sea ice model and ERA atmosphere on an Antarctic MetROMS ocean model, MetROMS-UHel-v1.0

Abstract. In recent years, the Antarctic sea ice has experienced major changes, which are neither well understood nor adequately reproduced by Earth system models. To support model development with an aim to improve Antarctic sea ice and upper-ocean predictions, the impacts of updating the sea ice model and the atmospheric forcing are investigated. In the new MetROMS-UHel-v1.0 (henceforth MetROMS-UHel) ocean–sea ice model, the sea ice component has been updated from CICE5 to CICE6, and the forcing has been updated from ERA-Interim (ERAI) to ERA5 reanalyses. The two versions of MetROMS evaluated in this study use a version of the regional ROMS ocean model including ice shelf cavities. We find that the update of CICE (Community Ice CodE) and ERA reduced the negative bias of the sea ice area in summer. However, the sea ice volume decreases after the CICE update but increases when the atmospheric forcing is updated. As a net result after both updates, the modelled sea ice becomes thinner and more deformed, particularly near the coast. The ROMS ocean model usually yielded a deeper ocean mixed layer compared to observations. Using ERA5, the situation was slightly improved. The update from CICE5 to CICE6 resulted in a fresher coastal ocean due to a smaller salt flux from sea ice to the ocean. In the ice shelf cavities, the modelled melt rates are generally underestimated compared with observations, with the largest underestimation coming from the ice shelves in the too cold Amundsen and Bellingshausen seas as well as from the Australian sector in East Antarctica. These identified sea ice and oceanic changes vary seasonally and regionally. By determining sea ice and oceanic changes after the model and forcing updates and evaluating them against observations, this study informs modellers on improvements and aspects requiring attention with potential model adjustments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscientific model development
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4823-2025
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impacts of the CICE sea ice model and ERA atmosphere on an Antarctic MetROMS ocean model, MetROMS-UHel-v1.0

Cecilia Äijälä, Yafei Nie, Petteri Juha Uotila, David A. Bailey et al.
2 citations
Geoscientific model development
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
2.60
article

Impacts of the CICE sea ice model and ERA atmosphere on an Antarctic MetROMS ocean model, MetROMS-UHel-v1.0

Cecilia Äijälä, Yafei Nie, Petteri Juha Uotila, David A. Bailey, Bin Cheng, Siv K. Lauvset, Chiara Falco, Lucía Gutiérrez‐Loza
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract. In recent years, the Antarctic sea ice has experienced major changes, which are neither well understood nor adequately reproduced by Earth system models. To support model development with an aim to improve Antarctic sea ice and upper-ocean predictions, the impacts of updating the sea ice model and the atmospheric forcing are investigated. In the new MetROMS-UHel-v1.0 (henceforth MetROMS-UHel) ocean–sea ice model, the sea ice component has been updated from CICE5 to CICE6, and the forcing has been updated from ERA-Interim (ERAI) to ERA5 reanalyses. The two versions of MetROMS evaluated in this study use a version of the regional ROMS ocean model including ice shelf cavities. We find that the update of CICE (Community Ice CodE) and ERA reduced the negative bias of the sea ice area in summer. However, the sea ice volume decreases after the CICE update but increases when the atmospheric forcing is updated. As a net result after both updates, the modelled sea ice becomes thinner and more deformed, particularly near the coast. The ROMS ocean model usually yielded a deeper ocean mixed layer compared to observations. Using ERA5, the situation was slightly improved. The update from CICE5 to CICE6 resulted in a fresher coastal ocean due to a smaller salt flux from sea ice to the ocean. In the ice shelf cavities, the modelled melt rates are generally underestimated compared with observations, with the largest underestimation coming from the ice shelves in the too cold Amundsen and Bellingshausen seas as well as from the Australian sector in East Antarctica. These identified sea ice and oceanic changes vary seasonally and regionally. By determining sea ice and oceanic changes after the model and forcing updates and evaluating them against observations, this study informs modellers on improvements and aspects requiring attention with potential model adjustments.

Geoscientific model developmentVol. 18(15)
National Science Foundation, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, H2020 Excellent Science
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
2.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.