A New Era for the OSCE Moscow Mechanism Following the 2022 Invasion of Ukraine

Abstract This article provides a critical examination of the Moscow Mechanism, a rapid-response tool within the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. Originally established in 1991 and rarely invoked during its first three decades of existence, the Mechanism has experienced a reinvigoration since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, having been triggered six times, four of which were in response to alleged violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law during the conflict. Drawing on the authors’ experience as experts in these four missions, the article offers a historical overview, explains the Mechanism’s procedural dynamics and assesses its unique features. Through a comprehensive analysis of its repeated use in respect of Ukraine, the article highlights both the strengths and limitations of the Moscow Mechanism, ultimately arguing that recent developments have revealed its full potential as an instrument for advancing international justice and accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International and Comparative Law Quarterly
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589325100754
Primary Topic
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A New Era for the OSCE Moscow Mechanism Following the 2022 Invasion of Ukraine

Veronika Bílková, Elīna Šteinerte
International and Comparative Law Quarterly
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
article

A New Era for the OSCE Moscow Mechanism Following the 2022 Invasion of Ukraine

Veronika Bílková, Elīna Šteinerte
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article provides a critical examination of the Moscow Mechanism, a rapid-response tool within the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. Originally established in 1991 and rarely invoked during its first three decades of existence, the Mechanism has experienced a reinvigoration since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, having been triggered six times, four of which were in response to alleged violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law during the conflict. Drawing on the authors’ experience as experts in these four missions, the article offers a historical overview, explains the Mechanism’s procedural dynamics and assesses its unique features. Through a comprehensive analysis of its repeated use in respect of Ukraine, the article highlights both the strengths and limitations of the Moscow Mechanism, ultimately arguing that recent developments have revealed its full potential as an instrument for advancing international justice and accountability.

International and Comparative Law QuarterlyVol. 74(2)
Charles University (CZ), University of Bristol (GB)
Univerzita Karlova v Praze
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.