Monetization of life-cycle based environmental impacts: a case study on external environmental costs of steel-based wear parts for biogas plants

This study investigates the external environmental costs (EEC) of steel-based wear-parts used in biogas plants by monetizing the life-cycle-based environmental impacts caused throughout the entire life cycle. A simplified cradle-to-grave based environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted using the commonly applied ReCiPe assessment method. Two monetization approaches were used to comparatively calculate the EEC: recently published TruePrice factors and traditional ReCiPe-based factors. The analysis revealed that EEC account for 8% to 14% of total production costs, indicating significant additional expenses. These costs are primarily driven by the steel used in the components. Sensitivity analysis identified climate change (CC), fossil depletion (FD), and fine particulate matter formation (FPMF) as the most influential impact categories. A 5% increase in the monetization factors resulted in a 1.6% rise in overall EEC. The findings demonstrate that the choice of monetization method significantly influences the estimated EEC. Furthermore, the use of more sustainable steel offers the greatest potential for reducing both environmental and economic impacts associated with steel-based wear parts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Storage and Saving
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enss.2025.05.003
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monetization of life-cycle based environmental impacts: a case study on external environmental costs of steel-based wear parts for biogas plants

Gerald Feichtinger, Wolfgang Posch
Energy Storage and Saving
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Monetization of life-cycle based environmental impacts: a case study on external environmental costs of steel-based wear parts for biogas plants

Gerald Feichtinger, Wolfgang Posch
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the external environmental costs (EEC) of steel-based wear-parts used in biogas plants by monetizing the life-cycle-based environmental impacts caused throughout the entire life cycle. A simplified cradle-to-grave based environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted using the commonly applied ReCiPe assessment method. Two monetization approaches were used to comparatively calculate the EEC: recently published TruePrice factors and traditional ReCiPe-based factors. The analysis revealed that EEC account for 8% to 14% of total production costs, indicating significant additional expenses. These costs are primarily driven by the steel used in the components. Sensitivity analysis identified climate change (CC), fossil depletion (FD), and fine particulate matter formation (FPMF) as the most influential impact categories. A 5% increase in the monetization factors resulted in a 1.6% rise in overall EEC. The findings demonstrate that the choice of monetization method significantly influences the estimated EEC. Furthermore, the use of more sustainable steel offers the greatest potential for reducing both environmental and economic impacts associated with steel-based wear parts.

Energy Storage and Saving
Montanuniversität Leoben (AT)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.