Probability of active navigational failures: incident analyses for use in ship-bridge allision risk assessments

Abstract This paper studies the probability of active navigational error events for use in ship–bridge allision risk analysis. To estimate the probability of these kinds of events, accident databases, incident reports and AIS data were studied; the case studies herein cover 6 years and 15 bridges in Scandinavia. The main findings of this paper show that there is great variation in the probability of ship–bridge allision due to active navigational errors, and it is not recommended to use the currently common practice of 2% uniform distribution of the number of ship passages on all bridges. Another important finding is that the probability of a ship striking a bridge due to the error type Wrong Course at a Turning point is not uniform along the length of the bridge, but is only likely to occur in a cone formation from the last turning point.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Navigation
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0373463325101100
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Maritime Navigation and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Probability of active navigational failures: incident analyses for use in ship-bridge allision risk assessments

Mathias Egeland Eidem, Axel Hörteborn
1 citations
Journal of Navigation
Maritime Navigation and Safety
1.15
article

Probability of active navigational failures: incident analyses for use in ship-bridge allision risk assessments

Mathias Egeland Eidem, Axel Hörteborn
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper studies the probability of active navigational error events for use in ship–bridge allision risk analysis. To estimate the probability of these kinds of events, accident databases, incident reports and AIS data were studied; the case studies herein cover 6 years and 15 bridges in Scandinavia. The main findings of this paper show that there is great variation in the probability of ship–bridge allision due to active navigational errors, and it is not recommended to use the currently common practice of 2% uniform distribution of the number of ship passages on all bridges. Another important finding is that the probability of a ship striking a bridge due to the error type Wrong Course at a Turning point is not uniform along the length of the bridge, but is only likely to occur in a cone formation from the last turning point.

Journal of NavigationVol. 78(2-3)
Norwegian Public Roads Administration (NO), RISE Research Institutes of Sweden (SE), Chalmers University of Technology (SE), University of Stavanger (NO)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Maritime Navigation and Safety
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Probability of active navigational failures: incident analyses for use in ship-bridge allision risk assessments — Mathias Egeland Eidem, Axel Hörteborn · Journal of Navigation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS