Urgensi Penataan Ulang Mekanisme Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia

The current Indonesian legal system recognizes two paths of judicial review, although this division of authority is constitutionally legal, but in practice it raises serious problems. One of them is the inconsistency of decisions between judicial institutions. For example, there is a Supreme Court decision that cancels Regional Regulations that have previously been studied by the Constitutional Court, causing confusion in the application of the law. This not only weakens the principle of legal certainty, but also raises problems in the effectiveness of the judicial system. This study aims to identify the concept of restructuring the ideal regulatory testing mechanism according to the principle of the state of law and the theory of norm hierarchy and analyze the need for restructuring the regulatory testing mechanism in Indonesia from the perspective of legal certainty, justice, and law enforcement effectiveness. The research method used in this study is normative juridical and uses a legislative approach. The results of the study show.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU SOSIAL POLITIK DAN HUMANIORA
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v3i2.5569
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Urgensi Penataan Ulang Mekanisme Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia

Wicipto Setiadi, Kaharuddin Kaharuddin, Ismarini Della Purnama, Novaranty Zura Dwiputri
1 links
JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU SOSIAL POLITIK DAN HUMANIORA
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

Urgensi Penataan Ulang Mekanisme Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia

Wicipto Setiadi, Kaharuddin Kaharuddin, Ismarini Della Purnama, Novaranty Zura Dwiputri
article en

Abstract

The current Indonesian legal system recognizes two paths of judicial review, although this division of authority is constitutionally legal, but in practice it raises serious problems. One of them is the inconsistency of decisions between judicial institutions. For example, there is a Supreme Court decision that cancels Regional Regulations that have previously been studied by the Constitutional Court, causing confusion in the application of the law. This not only weakens the principle of legal certainty, but also raises problems in the effectiveness of the judicial system. This study aims to identify the concept of restructuring the ideal regulatory testing mechanism according to the principle of the state of law and the theory of norm hierarchy and analyze the need for restructuring the regulatory testing mechanism in Indonesia from the perspective of legal certainty, justice, and law enforcement effectiveness. The research method used in this study is normative juridical and uses a legislative approach. The results of the study show.

JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU SOSIAL POLITIK DAN HUMANIORAVol. 3(2)
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.