Perlindungan Rahasia Dagang dalam Kerangka Haki: Studi Komparatif Indonesia dan Malaysia

This study examines the protection of trade secrets in the framework of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) by conducting a comparative study between Indonesia and Malaysia. Trade secrets are a form of intellectual property that has significant economic value for business actors but often receives inadequate attention compared to other forms of IPR. This research focuses on two main problems: first, the comparison of the legal framework for the protection of trade secrets in Indonesia and Malaysia in the context of Intellectual Property Rights; and second, the role of IPR-related institutions in both countries in providing protection for trade secrets. The research method used is normative legal research with a comparative approach and a statute approach. The data used are in the form of primary legal materials in the form of laws and regulations related to IPR in Indonesia and Malaysia, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of literature and scientific journals. The results of the study show that there are significant differences in the legal framework for the protection of trade secrets between Indonesia, which adopts a civil law system with special codification through Law No. 30 of 2000, and Malaysia, which applies a common law approach with a combination of court precedents and statutory law. In addition, there are differences in the roles and functions of IPR-related institutions in the two countries in providing protection for trade secrets, especially in terms of registration, law enforcement, and dispute resolution. The study concludes that despite differences in approaches, both Indonesia and Malaysia recognize the importance of trade secret protection within the framework of IPR, with Malaysia tending to have a more comprehensive protection system based on common law practices. Based on the findings of the study, it is recommended that Indonesia can adopt some positive aspects of Malaysia's trade secrets protection system, especially in terms of harmonizing the role of relevant institutions and strengthening law enforcement mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU SOSIAL POLITIK DAN HUMANIORA
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i1.5521
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perlindungan Rahasia Dagang dalam Kerangka Haki: Studi Komparatif Indonesia dan Malaysia

Muhammad Arya Azra, Atik Winarti, Ismarini Della Purnama, Renofadli Rizkisyah
JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU SOSIAL POLITIK DAN HUMANIORA
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

Perlindungan Rahasia Dagang dalam Kerangka Haki: Studi Komparatif Indonesia dan Malaysia

Muhammad Arya Azra, Atik Winarti, Ismarini Della Purnama, Renofadli Rizkisyah
article en

Abstract

This study examines the protection of trade secrets in the framework of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) by conducting a comparative study between Indonesia and Malaysia. Trade secrets are a form of intellectual property that has significant economic value for business actors but often receives inadequate attention compared to other forms of IPR. This research focuses on two main problems: first, the comparison of the legal framework for the protection of trade secrets in Indonesia and Malaysia in the context of Intellectual Property Rights; and second, the role of IPR-related institutions in both countries in providing protection for trade secrets. The research method used is normative legal research with a comparative approach and a statute approach. The data used are in the form of primary legal materials in the form of laws and regulations related to IPR in Indonesia and Malaysia, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of literature and scientific journals. The results of the study show that there are significant differences in the legal framework for the protection of trade secrets between Indonesia, which adopts a civil law system with special codification through Law No. 30 of 2000, and Malaysia, which applies a common law approach with a combination of court precedents and statutory law. In addition, there are differences in the roles and functions of IPR-related institutions in the two countries in providing protection for trade secrets, especially in terms of registration, law enforcement, and dispute resolution. The study concludes that despite differences in approaches, both Indonesia and Malaysia recognize the importance of trade secret protection within the framework of IPR, with Malaysia tending to have a more comprehensive protection system based on common law practices. Based on the findings of the study, it is recommended that Indonesia can adopt some positive aspects of Malaysia's trade secrets protection system, especially in terms of harmonizing the role of relevant institutions and strengthening law enforcement mechanisms.

JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU SOSIAL POLITIK DAN HUMANIORAVol. 4(1)
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.