Understanding Each Other: A Beauvoirian Second Person Approach

Abstract How can we understand people—ourselves and others? Does this require a special form of understanding, different from how we understand non‐human phenomena? In this paper, I develop a Beauvoirian‐inspired proposal for answering these questions. This proposed account of understanding people lends some support to a long tradition, according to which, we don't understand people in the same way that we understand non‐human natural phenomena insofar as understanding people (like literary works) requires an empathic, imaginative, simulationist, or interpretive form. Yet, the Beauvoirian view complicates and challenges this tradition by bringing out the irreducibly second‐personal structure of understanding people. It also highlights its embodied and ethical character. In emphasizing these, the Beauvoirian account offers a welcome alternative to empathic views of understanding people (and of relating to literature) and contributes to our understanding of the second‐person nexus. It also proposes a refreshing way of thinking about the ethical dimensions of epistemology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Philosophy
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.70018
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Each Other: A Beauvoirian Second Person Approach

Keren Gorodeisky
2 citations
European Journal of Philosophy
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
8.40
article

Understanding Each Other: A Beauvoirian Second Person Approach

Keren Gorodeisky
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract How can we understand people—ourselves and others? Does this require a special form of understanding, different from how we understand non‐human phenomena? In this paper, I develop a Beauvoirian‐inspired proposal for answering these questions. This proposed account of understanding people lends some support to a long tradition, according to which, we don't understand people in the same way that we understand non‐human natural phenomena insofar as understanding people (like literary works) requires an empathic, imaginative, simulationist, or interpretive form. Yet, the Beauvoirian view complicates and challenges this tradition by bringing out the irreducibly second‐personal structure of understanding people. It also highlights its embodied and ethical character. In emphasizing these, the Beauvoirian account offers a welcome alternative to empathic views of understanding people (and of relating to literature) and contributes to our understanding of the second‐person nexus. It also proposes a refreshing way of thinking about the ethical dimensions of epistemology.

European Journal of PhilosophyVol. 33(4)
Auburn University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.