One hundred years of managerial expertise in the business case studies

Abstract This diachronic study analyzes engagement features — epistemic positioning and interactivity in particular — in the business case studies published by the Harvard Business Review (HBR) over the last century (1922–2023). Our study is based on a small, specialized corpus of HBR case studies, covering three periods (1922–1929, 1961–1979 and 2008–2023) in which we compare the frequency of epistemic and interactivity features. After reviewing the literature on the expression of positioning and stance in specialized contexts, we conceptualize business case studies as a register, and we identify a set of features by adopting a corpus-based approach thanks to a semantic tagger. Our corpus-driven, quantitative analysis highlights sharp differences in the frequency patterns as well in the functions they fulfill in the discourse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Register Studies
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.25006.mil
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One hundred years of managerial expertise in the business case studies

Philippe Millot
Register Studies
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

One hundred years of managerial expertise in the business case studies

Philippe Millot
article en

Abstract

Abstract This diachronic study analyzes engagement features — epistemic positioning and interactivity in particular — in the business case studies published by the Harvard Business Review (HBR) over the last century (1922–2023). Our study is based on a small, specialized corpus of HBR case studies, covering three periods (1922–1929, 1961–1979 and 2008–2023) in which we compare the frequency of epistemic and interactivity features. After reviewing the literature on the expression of positioning and stance in specialized contexts, we conceptualize business case studies as a register, and we identify a set of features by adopting a corpus-based approach thanks to a semantic tagger. Our corpus-driven, quantitative analysis highlights sharp differences in the frequency patterns as well in the functions they fulfill in the discourse.

Register StudiesVol. 7(1)
University of Arizona (US), Université Lumière Lyon 2 (FR), Institut d'Histoire des Représentations et des Idées dans les Modernités (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.