Comparison of USG guided adductor canal block vs femoral nerve block for post-operative pain management in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomised controlled study

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a markedly invasive surgical intervention associated with postoperative pain, which impedes early ambulation. Optimizing postoperative analgesia is paramount for facilitating enhanced functional recovery. This investigation endeavored to delineate the comparative efficacy of adductor canal block (ACB) versus femoral nerve block (FNB) in the analgesic management of individuals undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Materials and Methods: A total of 100 ASA grade I–II patients were randomized into two groups (n = 50): Group A received ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block, and Group B received adductor canal block. Both groups were given 15 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine prior to catheter insertion, followed by a continuous infusion at 8 mL/hr. Postoperative VAS scores, analgesia duration, adverse effects, anesthetic requirements, and sensory and motor block characteristics were recorded. Results: In this study, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding hemodynamic parameters, age, sex, ASA distribution. Group A demonstrated a faster onset of sensory block (7.77±1.27 min) and a shorter duration (510.79±97.60 min) compared to Group B (8.51±1.32 min; 615.64±102.85 min). Similarly, the onset of motor block was slightly shorter and its duration was longer in Group A (10.72±2.09 min; 579.5±92.10 min) relative to Group B (11.04±2.05 min; 565.32±92.78 min). However, the duration of analgesia was notably shorter in Group A (11.04±3.85 hours) compared to Group B (15.59±4.63 hours), accompanied by higher mean VAS scores in Group A. The overall incidence of adverse drug reactions was minimal (3.0%) and comparable between the two cohorts. Conclusion: The present investigation delineated that both adductor canal block and femoral nerve block conferred efficacious postoperative nociceptive attenuation in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Nevertheless, there is motor sparing leading to early mobilization in patients with ACB when compared with FNB.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Anesthesiology Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33545/26649268.2025.v7.i2a.38
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of USG guided adductor canal block vs femoral nerve block for post-operative pain management in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomised controlled study

Vinay Kukreja, Gajanan Fultambkar, Soumya M. Reddy, Vijayanand Budi et al.
International Journal of Anesthesiology Sciences
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Comparison of USG guided adductor canal block vs femoral nerve block for post-operative pain management in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomised controlled study

Vinay Kukreja, Gajanan Fultambkar, Soumya M. Reddy, Vijayanand Budi, David Raju, Tejaswini Billakanti, P Rajeswar
article en

Abstract

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a markedly invasive surgical intervention associated with postoperative pain, which impedes early ambulation. Optimizing postoperative analgesia is paramount for facilitating enhanced functional recovery. This investigation endeavored to delineate the comparative efficacy of adductor canal block (ACB) versus femoral nerve block (FNB) in the analgesic management of individuals undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Materials and Methods: A total of 100 ASA grade I–II patients were randomized into two groups (n = 50): Group A received ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block, and Group B received adductor canal block. Both groups were given 15 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine prior to catheter insertion, followed by a continuous infusion at 8 mL/hr. Postoperative VAS scores, analgesia duration, adverse effects, anesthetic requirements, and sensory and motor block characteristics were recorded. Results: In this study, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding hemodynamic parameters, age, sex, ASA distribution. Group A demonstrated a faster onset of sensory block (7.77±1.27 min) and a shorter duration (510.79±97.60 min) compared to Group B (8.51±1.32 min; 615.64±102.85 min). Similarly, the onset of motor block was slightly shorter and its duration was longer in Group A (10.72±2.09 min; 579.5±92.10 min) relative to Group B (11.04±2.05 min; 565.32±92.78 min). However, the duration of analgesia was notably shorter in Group A (11.04±3.85 hours) compared to Group B (15.59±4.63 hours), accompanied by higher mean VAS scores in Group A. The overall incidence of adverse drug reactions was minimal (3.0%) and comparable between the two cohorts. Conclusion: The present investigation delineated that both adductor canal block and femoral nerve block conferred efficacious postoperative nociceptive attenuation in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Nevertheless, there is motor sparing leading to early mobilization in patients with ACB when compared with FNB.

International Journal of Anesthesiology SciencesVol. 7(2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.