Clinician’s perspectives on the use of levocetirizine alone or in combination therapy in allergic rhinitis

Objective: To gather expert perspectives on the use of levocetirizine-montelukast combination in managing allergic rhinitis (AR) within the Indian context. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among clinical experts using a 24-item questionnaire to collect their opinion on the use of levocetirizine, both as monotherapy and in combination with montelukast, in the routine management of AR. The survey explored various aspects such as clinical observations, clinician preferences, and experiences with levocetirizine alone and in combination with montelukast. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The survey included 551 experts. A substantial proportion (72%) indicated that patient visits for AR symptoms are most frequent during the winter season. Asthma emerged as the most commonly associated comorbidity, as reported by 86% of physicians. The majority (90%) identified levocetirizine as their preferred antihistamine in clinical practice. Around 78% of respondents consistently favored combining montelukast with antihistamines for treating AR, and 93% specifically preferred the levocetirizine-montelukast combination. Sedation was reported as the most frequent adverse effect associated with levocetirizine by 84% of respondents. Furthermore, 84% of practitioners indicated that their first-line approach for managing AR involves a combination of an antihistamine and montelukast. Additionally, 58% believed that incorporating montelukast with an antihistamine enhances treatment efficacy. Conclusion: The survey highlights physicians' preference for levocetirizine, particularly when combined with montelukast, for managing AR due to its efficacy and tolerability. Asthma was the most commonly associated comorbidity, while sedation was the primary adverse effect reported. Combination therapy is widely favored as a first-line treatment strategy, especially during the winter season.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Otolaryngology Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33545/26646455.2025.v7.i2a.64
Primary Topic
Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinician’s perspectives on the use of levocetirizine alone or in combination therapy in allergic rhinitis

Krishna Kumar M, S Manjula
International Journal of Otolaryngology Research
Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
article

Clinician’s perspectives on the use of levocetirizine alone or in combination therapy in allergic rhinitis

Krishna Kumar M, S Manjula
article en

Abstract

Objective: To gather expert perspectives on the use of levocetirizine-montelukast combination in managing allergic rhinitis (AR) within the Indian context. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among clinical experts using a 24-item questionnaire to collect their opinion on the use of levocetirizine, both as monotherapy and in combination with montelukast, in the routine management of AR. The survey explored various aspects such as clinical observations, clinician preferences, and experiences with levocetirizine alone and in combination with montelukast. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The survey included 551 experts. A substantial proportion (72%) indicated that patient visits for AR symptoms are most frequent during the winter season. Asthma emerged as the most commonly associated comorbidity, as reported by 86% of physicians. The majority (90%) identified levocetirizine as their preferred antihistamine in clinical practice. Around 78% of respondents consistently favored combining montelukast with antihistamines for treating AR, and 93% specifically preferred the levocetirizine-montelukast combination. Sedation was reported as the most frequent adverse effect associated with levocetirizine by 84% of respondents. Furthermore, 84% of practitioners indicated that their first-line approach for managing AR involves a combination of an antihistamine and montelukast. Additionally, 58% believed that incorporating montelukast with an antihistamine enhances treatment efficacy. Conclusion: The survey highlights physicians' preference for levocetirizine, particularly when combined with montelukast, for managing AR due to its efficacy and tolerability. Asthma was the most commonly associated comorbidity, while sedation was the primary adverse effect reported. Combination therapy is widely favored as a first-line treatment strategy, especially during the winter season.

International Journal of Otolaryngology ResearchVol. 7(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Clinician’s perspectives on the use of levocetirizine alone or in combination therapy in allergic rhinitis — Krishna Kumar M, S Manjula · International Journal of Otolaryngology Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS