Comparing Human-Designed and AI-Enhanced Science Lessons: A Pilot Study in K-5 Education

Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd) is a rapidly growing field, yet concrete applications in early Science Education remain limited.This pilot study investigates the impact and perception of generative AI tools in designing and delivering science lessons in K-5 classrooms, compared to traditional human-designed instruction.The research was conducted in two phases: i) a preliminary survey involving Italian nursery and primary school teachers to assess familiarity and expectations toward educational technologies, and ii) a field intervention comparing six traditional and six AI-assisted science lessons, followed by a second structured questionnaire completed by seven teachers.Results reveal that while traditional teaching remains essential for fostering foundational skills, empathy, and real-world connections, AI/GAI tools can enhance engagement through immersive and adaptive experiences.However, effective integration requires targeted teacher training and mindful implementation.This study highlights the complementary strengths of human and AI-led instruction, advocating for balanced, inclusive, and pedagogically grounded innovation in early STEM education.However, further research is needed to evaluate long-term educational impact and scalability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Iris Journal of Educational Research
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33552/ijer.2025.05.000608
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Human-Designed and AI-Enhanced Science Lessons: A Pilot Study in K-5 Education

Antonella Senese
Iris Journal of Educational Research
Engineering Education and Technology
article

Comparing Human-Designed and AI-Enhanced Science Lessons: A Pilot Study in K-5 Education

Antonella Senese
article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd) is a rapidly growing field, yet concrete applications in early Science Education remain limited.This pilot study investigates the impact and perception of generative AI tools in designing and delivering science lessons in K-5 classrooms, compared to traditional human-designed instruction.The research was conducted in two phases: i) a preliminary survey involving Italian nursery and primary school teachers to assess familiarity and expectations toward educational technologies, and ii) a field intervention comparing six traditional and six AI-assisted science lessons, followed by a second structured questionnaire completed by seven teachers.Results reveal that while traditional teaching remains essential for fostering foundational skills, empathy, and real-world connections, AI/GAI tools can enhance engagement through immersive and adaptive experiences.However, effective integration requires targeted teacher training and mindful implementation.This study highlights the complementary strengths of human and AI-led instruction, advocating for balanced, inclusive, and pedagogically grounded innovation in early STEM education.However, further research is needed to evaluate long-term educational impact and scalability.

Iris Journal of Educational ResearchVol. 5(2)
University of Milan (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Engineering Education and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing Human-Designed and AI-Enhanced Science Lessons: A Pilot Study in K-5 Education — Antonella Senese · Iris Journal of Educational Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS