FAILURES IN AUDITS AND MEDICAL BOARDS IN THE EVALUATION FOR SPINE SURGERY AUTHORIZATION IN BRAZIL

ABSTRACT Objective: The audit and medical board in surgeries focuses on the evaluation and adequacy of surgical procedures. The objective was to compare whether the evaluations were in line with the resolutions of the Federal Council of Medicine (CFM) and the standards of the National Health Agency (ANS) in conducting audits for the release of spinal surgical procedures. Methods: The research was conducted through document analysis of the results of audits and medical boards for the evaluation and release of surgical procedures in neurosurgery and spinal surgery. Results: A total of 55 audits were evaluated. The most frequent failures on the part of the audit were the denial of material in 49 audits (89.09%) and the denial of procedure in 46 audits (83.63%), which effectively vetoed the procedure. Conclusion: The failures identified in the audits and medical boards of surgeries can compromise the impartiality and quality of the audit process. These failures can lead to an increase in complaints from health insurance companies to other regulatory agencies. Level of Evidence IV; Economic and Decision Analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Coluna/Columna
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/s1808-185120252402295067
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FAILURES IN AUDITS AND MEDICAL BOARDS IN THE EVALUATION FOR SPINE SURGERY AUTHORIZATION IN BRAZIL

RODRIGO ANTONIO ROCHA DA CRUZ ADRY
1 citations
Coluna/Columna
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
2.02
article

FAILURES IN AUDITS AND MEDICAL BOARDS IN THE EVALUATION FOR SPINE SURGERY AUTHORIZATION IN BRAZIL

RODRIGO ANTONIO ROCHA DA CRUZ ADRY
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: The audit and medical board in surgeries focuses on the evaluation and adequacy of surgical procedures. The objective was to compare whether the evaluations were in line with the resolutions of the Federal Council of Medicine (CFM) and the standards of the National Health Agency (ANS) in conducting audits for the release of spinal surgical procedures. Methods: The research was conducted through document analysis of the results of audits and medical boards for the evaluation and release of surgical procedures in neurosurgery and spinal surgery. Results: A total of 55 audits were evaluated. The most frequent failures on the part of the audit were the denial of material in 49 audits (89.09%) and the denial of procedure in 46 audits (83.63%), which effectively vetoed the procedure. Conclusion: The failures identified in the audits and medical boards of surgeries can compromise the impartiality and quality of the audit process. These failures can lead to an increase in complaints from health insurance companies to other regulatory agencies. Level of Evidence IV; Economic and Decision Analysis.

Coluna/ColumnaVol. 24(2)
Health Care Foundation (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.