Perception of Vertical Greening Applications on Historic Buildings

The implementation of Vertical Greening Systems (VGS), like green façades, on historic building facades is approached with caution due to concerns regarding material compatibility, visual impact, and potential compromises to cultural significance. However, VGS can offer significant contributions to urban sustainability when integrated with knowledge and care of historic buildings by reducing the urban heat island effect, improving air quality, fostering a green economy, and creating greener environments. These tensions highlight a critical research gap: how can VGS contribute to urban sustainability while respecting the values of historic building façades? This study addresses this gap by exploring professional interest groups’ opinions on implementing VGS on historic buildings, focusing on the perceived benefits and concerns from environmental, social, economic, cultural, legal, and technical aspects. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining the findings from the literature review with a survey targeting individuals involved in VGS implementations or heritage conservation. The survey included both open- and closed-ended questions. Of the 165 individuals contacted, 83 valid responses were analyzed. Results from the open-ended questions showed that 89% of respondents recognized the environmental benefits of VGS, while 85% raised technical issues, particularly regarding material compatibility. An important insight emerged from comparing open-ended and closed-ended responses: respondents were more likely to acknowledge the benefits of VGS when prompted. This indicates that raising awareness about the use of VGS on historic buildings is essential. The findings offer practical implications for early-stage planning, stakeholder engagement, and the design of heritage conservation policy. They illustrate a need for an informed decision-making process for the integration of VGS onto historic building facades, aligning with conservation ethics and urban sustainability. Preface: This study aims to create a discussion on the potential synergies between vertical greening and historic buildings, with the intention of guiding future conservation strategies to enhance urban sustainability. We do not advocate for vertical greenery as a universal solution, but rather seek to explore under which conditions vertical greening may be compatible with conservation practice. For the purposes of this study, “historic buildings” refer to structures that possess cultural, architectural, or historical significance, whether they are formally protected or informally valued by their communities. We acknowledge that the term may vary in meaning across different national and cultural contexts. Moreover, our analysis focuses on cases where both the vertical greening and historic façades are presumed to be in structurally sound and well-maintained condition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heritage
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8080316
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perception of Vertical Greening Applications on Historic Buildings

Tim De Kock, Marie De Groeve, Yonca Erkan, Eda Kale
1 citations
Heritage
Urban Green Space and Health
1.20
article

Perception of Vertical Greening Applications on Historic Buildings

Tim De Kock, Marie De Groeve, Yonca Erkan, Eda Kale
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The implementation of Vertical Greening Systems (VGS), like green façades, on historic building facades is approached with caution due to concerns regarding material compatibility, visual impact, and potential compromises to cultural significance. However, VGS can offer significant contributions to urban sustainability when integrated with knowledge and care of historic buildings by reducing the urban heat island effect, improving air quality, fostering a green economy, and creating greener environments. These tensions highlight a critical research gap: how can VGS contribute to urban sustainability while respecting the values of historic building façades? This study addresses this gap by exploring professional interest groups’ opinions on implementing VGS on historic buildings, focusing on the perceived benefits and concerns from environmental, social, economic, cultural, legal, and technical aspects. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining the findings from the literature review with a survey targeting individuals involved in VGS implementations or heritage conservation. The survey included both open- and closed-ended questions. Of the 165 individuals contacted, 83 valid responses were analyzed. Results from the open-ended questions showed that 89% of respondents recognized the environmental benefits of VGS, while 85% raised technical issues, particularly regarding material compatibility. An important insight emerged from comparing open-ended and closed-ended responses: respondents were more likely to acknowledge the benefits of VGS when prompted. This indicates that raising awareness about the use of VGS on historic buildings is essential. The findings offer practical implications for early-stage planning, stakeholder engagement, and the design of heritage conservation policy. They illustrate a need for an informed decision-making process for the integration of VGS onto historic building facades, aligning with conservation ethics and urban sustainability. Preface: This study aims to create a discussion on the potential synergies between vertical greening and historic buildings, with the intention of guiding future conservation strategies to enhance urban sustainability. We do not advocate for vertical greenery as a universal solution, but rather seek to explore under which conditions vertical greening may be compatible with conservation practice. For the purposes of this study, “historic buildings” refer to structures that possess cultural, architectural, or historical significance, whether they are formally protected or informally valued by their communities. We acknowledge that the term may vary in meaning across different national and cultural contexts. Moreover, our analysis focuses on cases where both the vertical greening and historic façades are presumed to be in structurally sound and well-maintained condition.

HeritageVol. 8(8)
University of Antwerp (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Universiteit Antwerpen
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Urban Green Space and Health
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.