Characterization theorem for third degree symmetric semiclassical forms of class two

Relying on their third degree character, this paper offers a comprehensive description of a large family of symmetric semiclassical forms of class two. A characterization theorem for all third degree symmetric semiclassical forms of class two is stated and proved. In fact, by using the Stieltjes function and the moments of those forms, we give necessary and sufficient conditions for a regular form to be at the same time of strict third degree (resp. second degree), symmetric and semiclassical of class two under condition ?(0) = 0. Thus, we focus our attention on the link between these forms and the Jacobi forms Vk,lq := J(k + q/3, l ? q/3), k + l ? ?1, k, l ? Z, q ? {1, 2} (resp. Tp,q := J(p ? 1/2, q ? 1/2), p + q ? 0, p, q ? Z). All of them are rational transformations of the Jacobi form V := J (?2/3,?1/3) (resp. the Tchebychev form of first kind T := J (?1/2,?1/2)).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Filomat
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2298/fil2507101k
Primary Topic
Advanced Algebra and Geometry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterization theorem for third degree symmetric semiclassical forms of class two

Mohamed Khalfallah
Filomat
Advanced Algebra and Geometry
article

Characterization theorem for third degree symmetric semiclassical forms of class two

Mohamed Khalfallah
article en

Abstract

Relying on their third degree character, this paper offers a comprehensive description of a large family of symmetric semiclassical forms of class two. A characterization theorem for all third degree symmetric semiclassical forms of class two is stated and proved. In fact, by using the Stieltjes function and the moments of those forms, we give necessary and sufficient conditions for a regular form to be at the same time of strict third degree (resp. second degree), symmetric and semiclassical of class two under condition ?(0) = 0. Thus, we focus our attention on the link between these forms and the Jacobi forms Vk,lq := J(k + q/3, l ? q/3), k + l ? ?1, k, l ? Z, q ? {1, 2} (resp. Tp,q := J(p ? 1/2, q ? 1/2), p + q ? 0, p, q ? Z). All of them are rational transformations of the Jacobi form V := J (?2/3,?1/3) (resp. the Tchebychev form of first kind T := J (?1/2,?1/2)).

FilomatVol. 39(7)
University of Monastir (TN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Advanced Algebra and Geometry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.