Patellofemoral Joint Stress During Front and Back Squats at Two Depths

The purpose of this study was to identify differences between patellofemoral joint stress (PFJS), patellofemoral joint reaction force (PFJRF), quadriceps force, trunk and knee flexion angles, and horizontal position of applied load relative to the knee and heel between the front squat (FS) and back squat (BS) exercises at two depths (60 and 80% of leg length, where 60% represents a lower squat depth). Twenty-two healthy college-aged females (age: 22.23 ± 1.86 years, mass: 67.65 ± 9.60 kg, height: 171.34 ± 6.38 cm) participated in this study. Mechanical variables were measured or estimated using a 15-camera 3D motion analysis (180 Hz) system and force platforms (1800 Hz). Five repetitions of each squatting technique at each depth were performed. Multivariate testing showed a difference in patellofemoral loading variables, trunk and knee kinematics, and bar position relative to the heel and knee (p = 0.00) between squat depths. There was no difference between techniques, no interaction between depth and techniques (p > 0.05). Follow-up univariate analyses showed differences in PFJS, PFJRF, quadriceps force, horizontal bar position relative to the heel and knee, and knee and trunk flexion between squat depths. The similar joint stress observed between FS and BS may be explained by compensatory trunk mechanics or the use of a light external load.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15168784
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patellofemoral Joint Stress During Front and Back Squats at Two Depths

Naghmeh Gheidi, Rachel Kiminski, Matthew Besch, Thomas W. Kernozek et al.
Applied Sciences
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Patellofemoral Joint Stress During Front and Back Squats at Two Depths

Naghmeh Gheidi, Rachel Kiminski, Matthew Besch, Thomas W. Kernozek, Abbigail Ristow, Brian Wallace
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify differences between patellofemoral joint stress (PFJS), patellofemoral joint reaction force (PFJRF), quadriceps force, trunk and knee flexion angles, and horizontal position of applied load relative to the knee and heel between the front squat (FS) and back squat (BS) exercises at two depths (60 and 80% of leg length, where 60% represents a lower squat depth). Twenty-two healthy college-aged females (age: 22.23 ± 1.86 years, mass: 67.65 ± 9.60 kg, height: 171.34 ± 6.38 cm) participated in this study. Mechanical variables were measured or estimated using a 15-camera 3D motion analysis (180 Hz) system and force platforms (1800 Hz). Five repetitions of each squatting technique at each depth were performed. Multivariate testing showed a difference in patellofemoral loading variables, trunk and knee kinematics, and bar position relative to the heel and knee (p = 0.00) between squat depths. There was no difference between techniques, no interaction between depth and techniques (p > 0.05). Follow-up univariate analyses showed differences in PFJS, PFJRF, quadriceps force, horizontal bar position relative to the heel and knee, and knee and trunk flexion between squat depths. The similar joint stress observed between FS and BS may be explained by compensatory trunk mechanics or the use of a light external load.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(16)
University of Wisconsin–La Crosse (US), University of Wisconsin–Oshkosh (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.