Tiny Beads, Big Problems: Water Bead Ingestions—A Case Series

<b>Background:</b> Water beads are estimated to have caused >8000 emergency department (ED) visits from 2017 to 2022. Lethality after ingestion has been reported. The literature to guide management is scarce. We aimed to characterize three notable cases of water bead ingestions. <b>Methods:</b> We report the patient's presentations, diagnostic modalities, clinical courses, intervention(s) required, and outcomes of the three children who ingested water beads. <b>Results:</b> All patients (ages 8 months-36 months old) presented to the ED with concern for water bead ingestion. Two developed clinical small bowel obstruction and required laparotomy-both required repeat laparotomy after further expansion of previously missed beads. The third patient ingested dozens of water beads but did not develop an obstruction or require surgery. X-rays, cross-sectional imaging, and ultrasounds were employed with variable results. <b>Conclusions:</b> While variable bead expansion rates can necessitate multiple interventions in some children, older children may be less prone to obstructing after water bead ingestion. This case series demonstrates the variability in presentation, management, and outcome of an increasingly common pediatric surgical problem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/children12081041
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Foreign Body Medical Cases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tiny Beads, Big Problems: Water Bead Ingestions—A Case Series

Jose H. Salazar, Heather E. Olson, Kathleen M. Leack, Caroline Maloney et al.
2 citations
Children
Foreign Body Medical Cases
2.72
article

Tiny Beads, Big Problems: Water Bead Ingestions—A Case Series

Jose H. Salazar, Heather E. Olson, Kathleen M. Leack, Caroline Maloney, Karlo Kovačić, Jennifer M Schuh
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Water beads are estimated to have caused >8000 emergency department (ED) visits from 2017 to 2022. Lethality after ingestion has been reported. The literature to guide management is scarce. We aimed to characterize three notable cases of water bead ingestions. <b>Methods:</b> We report the patient's presentations, diagnostic modalities, clinical courses, intervention(s) required, and outcomes of the three children who ingested water beads. <b>Results:</b> All patients (ages 8 months-36 months old) presented to the ED with concern for water bead ingestion. Two developed clinical small bowel obstruction and required laparotomy-both required repeat laparotomy after further expansion of previously missed beads. The third patient ingested dozens of water beads but did not develop an obstruction or require surgery. X-rays, cross-sectional imaging, and ultrasounds were employed with variable results. <b>Conclusions:</b> While variable bead expansion rates can necessitate multiple interventions in some children, older children may be less prone to obstructing after water bead ingestion. This case series demonstrates the variability in presentation, management, and outcome of an increasingly common pediatric surgical problem.

ChildrenVol. 12(8)
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Foreign Body Medical Cases
2.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.