Attitudes, Perceptions, and Factors Influencing the Adoption of AI in Health Care Among Medical Staff: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study (Preprint)

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated transformative potential in the health care field; yet, its clinical adoption faces challenges such as inaccuracy, bias, and data privacy concerns. As the primary operators of AI systems, physicians and nurses play a pivotal role in integrating AI into clinical workflows. Their acceptance and use of AI are essential for bridging the gap between technological innovation and practical implementation. Exploring Chinese medical staff’s attitudes and identifying key factors influencing AI adoption are fundamental to developing targeted strategies to facilitate the effective application of AI in clinical settings. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aims to investigate attitudes and perceptions regarding medical AI among physicians and nurses in China and identify the factors influencing its adoption. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted online from December 12 to 26, 2024. Participants were recruited from the Chinese Medical Association and the Chinese Nursing Association. The structured questionnaire assessed demographic characteristics, knowledge and attitudes toward medical AI, experiences and insights regarding using medical AI, and perceptions and factors influencing the adoption of AI based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model. Multiple linear regression and Karlson-Holm-Breen mediation analysis were used to identify influencing factors. Sample weighting by regional distribution was applied for sensitivity analysis. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> The survey included 991 physicians and 1714 nurses. Among the respondents, 92.4% (916/991) of the physicians and 84.19% (1443/1714) of the nurses reported awareness of medical AI applications, 22.8% (226/991) of the physicians and 17% (291/1714) of the nurses had used AI, and 82.6% (819/991) of the physicians and 80.22% (1375/1714) of the nurses held optimistic views about AI’s prospects. After adjusting for covariates, performance expectancy (physicians: B=0.144, 95% CI 0.092-0.197; nurses: B=0.292, 95% CI 0.245-0.338), effort expectancy (physicians: B=0.681, 95% CI 0.562-0.800; nurses: B=0.440, 95% CI 0.342-0.538), social influence (physicians: B=0.264, 95% CI 0.187-0.341; nurses: B=0.098, 95% CI 0.045-0.152), and facilitating conditions (physicians: B=0.098, 95% CI 0.030-0.165; nurses: B=0.158, 95% CI 0.105-0.212) had significant positive impacts on willingness to use AI. Perceived risk showed no significant effect on physicians’ intention to use AI (B=0.012, 95% CI −0.022 to 0.045) but negatively impacted nurses’ intention to use AI (B=−0.041, 95% CI −0.066 to −0.015). Performance expectancy and effort expectancy partially mediated the relationship between facilitating conditions and intention to use. Age, educational level, hospital level, work experience, and personal views also significantly influenced willingness. Weighted and unweighted analyses yielded consistent results, confirming the robustness of the findings. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Substantial disparities exist between high willingness to adopt medical AI and its low actual use among Chinese medical staff. System optimization focusing on utility enhancement, workflow integration, and risk mitigation for medical staff, along with support for infrastructure and training, could accelerate AI adoption in clinical practice. </sec>

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.75343
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attitudes, Perceptions, and Factors Influencing the Adoption of AI in Health Care Among Medical Staff: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study (Preprint)

Zhaoji Li, Yi‐Da Tang, Jiaojiao Liao, Qianqian Dai et al.
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Attitudes, Perceptions, and Factors Influencing the Adoption of AI in Health Care Among Medical Staff: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study (Preprint)

Zhaoji Li, Yi‐Da Tang, Jiaojiao Liao, Qianqian Dai, E Weinan, Liyuan Tao, Ming Li, Zhaoyu Wang, Mengyu Yang, Shiwu Shi
article en

Abstract

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated transformative potential in the health care field; yet, its clinical adoption faces challenges such as inaccuracy, bias, and data privacy concerns. As the primary operators of AI systems, physicians and nurses play a pivotal role in integrating AI into clinical workflows. Their acceptance and use of AI are essential for bridging the gap between technological innovation and practical implementation. Exploring Chinese medical staff’s attitudes and identifying key factors influencing AI adoption are fundamental to developing targeted strategies to facilitate the effective application of AI in clinical settings. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aims to investigate attitudes and perceptions regarding medical AI among physicians and nurses in China and identify the factors influencing its adoption. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted online from December 12 to 26, 2024. Participants were recruited from the Chinese Medical Association and the Chinese Nursing Association. The structured questionnaire assessed demographic characteristics, knowledge and attitudes toward medical AI, experiences and insights regarding using medical AI, and perceptions and factors influencing the adoption of AI based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model. Multiple linear regression and Karlson-Holm-Breen mediation analysis were used to identify influencing factors. Sample weighting by regional distribution was applied for sensitivity analysis. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> The survey included 991 physicians and 1714 nurses. Among the respondents, 92.4% (916/991) of the physicians and 84.19% (1443/1714) of the nurses reported awareness of medical AI applications, 22.8% (226/991) of the physicians and 17% (291/1714) of the nurses had used AI, and 82.6% (819/991) of the physicians and 80.22% (1375/1714) of the nurses held optimistic views about AI’s prospects. After adjusting for covariates, performance expectancy (physicians: B=0.144, 95% CI 0.092-0.197; nurses: B=0.292, 95% CI 0.245-0.338), effort expectancy (physicians: B=0.681, 95% CI 0.562-0.800; nurses: B=0.440, 95% CI 0.342-0.538), social influence (physicians: B=0.264, 95% CI 0.187-0.341; nurses: B=0.098, 95% CI 0.045-0.152), and facilitating conditions (physicians: B=0.098, 95% CI 0.030-0.165; nurses: B=0.158, 95% CI 0.105-0.212) had significant positive impacts on willingness to use AI. Perceived risk showed no significant effect on physicians’ intention to use AI (B=0.012, 95% CI −0.022 to 0.045) but negatively impacted nurses’ intention to use AI (B=−0.041, 95% CI −0.066 to −0.015). Performance expectancy and effort expectancy partially mediated the relationship between facilitating conditions and intention to use. Age, educational level, hospital level, work experience, and personal views also significantly influenced willingness. Weighted and unweighted analyses yielded consistent results, confirming the robustness of the findings. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Substantial disparities exist between high willingness to adopt medical AI and its low actual use among Chinese medical staff. System optimization focusing on utility enhancement, workflow integration, and risk mitigation for medical staff, along with support for infrastructure and training, could accelerate AI adoption in clinical practice. </sec>

Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.