Enhancing perceived effectiveness can increase climate policy acceptance

Public acceptance is crucial for the successful implementation of climate policies; hence, it is essential to understand its determinants and how to boost it. In this research, we aim to test the causality of perceived effectiveness on policy acceptance. For this purpose, we experimentally manipulated perceived effectiveness by providing information about the objective effectiveness of a climate policy. In a preregistered experiment ( N = 953; T1), participants were asked about the perceived effectiveness and acceptance of a speed limit on German highways. Beforehand, participants in the information condition were given details about the speed limit's effectiveness in terms of CO 2 reductions, whereas those in the control condition were not. Participants were asked about the perceived effectiveness and policy acceptance again 1.5 years later ( n = 334; T2). We found that providing vs. not providing such information led to higher perceived effectiveness but not greater policy acceptance at T1. However, among those participants without prior knowledge of the speed limit's effectiveness, providing the information positively affected both perceived effectiveness and policy acceptance at T1. Among those people who learned about the effectiveness of the policy at T1, perceived effectiveness and policy acceptance were higher when they could (vs. could not) recall the effectiveness information after 1.5 years (i.e., at T2). Our results suggest that perceived effectiveness causally affects policy acceptance in the climate domain. Explaining the objective effectiveness of climate policies—and doing so in such a way that people can remember the information over time—thus offers a promising approach for policymakers to increase public acceptance of climate policies. • Perceived effectiveness is considered a key determinant of climate policy acceptance. • We tested the proposed causal effect of perceived effectiveness on policy acceptance in a preregistered experiment. • Perceived effectiveness was experimentally manipulated by providing vs. not providing objective effectiveness information. • We found a causal effect of perceived effectiveness for participants without prior knowledge of the policy’s effectiveness. • Providing effectiveness information can be a promising way to strengthen policy acceptance among less informed individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102725
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing perceived effectiveness can increase climate policy acceptance

Cornelia Betsch, Lena Lehrer, Kevin E. Tiede, Hellen Temme
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Environmental Education and Sustainability
article

Enhancing perceived effectiveness can increase climate policy acceptance

Cornelia Betsch, Lena Lehrer, Kevin E. Tiede, Hellen Temme
article en

Abstract

Public acceptance is crucial for the successful implementation of climate policies; hence, it is essential to understand its determinants and how to boost it. In this research, we aim to test the causality of perceived effectiveness on policy acceptance. For this purpose, we experimentally manipulated perceived effectiveness by providing information about the objective effectiveness of a climate policy. In a preregistered experiment ( N = 953; T1), participants were asked about the perceived effectiveness and acceptance of a speed limit on German highways. Beforehand, participants in the information condition were given details about the speed limit's effectiveness in terms of CO 2 reductions, whereas those in the control condition were not. Participants were asked about the perceived effectiveness and policy acceptance again 1.5 years later ( n = 334; T2). We found that providing vs. not providing such information led to higher perceived effectiveness but not greater policy acceptance at T1. However, among those participants without prior knowledge of the speed limit's effectiveness, providing the information positively affected both perceived effectiveness and policy acceptance at T1. Among those people who learned about the effectiveness of the policy at T1, perceived effectiveness and policy acceptance were higher when they could (vs. could not) recall the effectiveness information after 1.5 years (i.e., at T2). Our results suggest that perceived effectiveness causally affects policy acceptance in the climate domain. Explaining the objective effectiveness of climate policies—and doing so in such a way that people can remember the information over time—thus offers a promising approach for policymakers to increase public acceptance of climate policies. • Perceived effectiveness is considered a key determinant of climate policy acceptance. • We tested the proposed causal effect of perceived effectiveness on policy acceptance in a preregistered experiment. • Perceived effectiveness was experimentally manipulated by providing vs. not providing objective effectiveness information. • We found a causal effect of perceived effectiveness for participants without prior knowledge of the policy’s effectiveness. • Providing effectiveness information can be a promising way to strengthen policy acceptance among less informed individuals.

Journal of Environmental PsychologyVol. 106
University of Erfurt (DE), University of Applied Sciences Erfurt (DE), Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE), Rational (Germany) (DE), Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine (DE), University of Bamberg (DE)
Bundesministerium für Gesundheit, Klaus Tschira Stiftung, Robert Koch Institut, Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.