Interobserver Agreement in Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Folate Receptor Alpha (FRα) in Ovarian Cancer: A Multicentre Study

Folate receptor alpha (FRα) is a high-affinity folate transporter overexpressed in various epithelial malignancies, particularly high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Given its restricted expression in normal tissues and accessibility in tumors, FRα is an emerging therapeutic target. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the standard method for FRα assessment; however, interpretation is semi-quantitative and prone to interobserver variability. This study aimed to evaluate interobserver agreement among 12 pathologists in the IHC assessment of FRα in ovarian cancer, focusing on internal control adequacy, staining intensity, and the percentage of FRα-positive tumor cells. Thirty-seven high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma cases were stained using the VENTANA FOLR1 (FOLR1-2.1) RxDx Assay. A reference panel of four expert pathologists established consensus diagnoses. Twelve pathologists independently assessed the slides, recording internal control adequacy, staining intensity (positive vs. negative), and percentage of FRα-positive tumor cells. Interobserver agreement was measured using Fleiss' kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Agreement on internal control adequacy was almost perfect (κ = 0.84). Substantial agreement was observed for staining intensity (κ = 0.76), while percentage estimation showed almost perfect concordance (ICC = 0.89). Discrepancies were primarily confined to borderline cases (65-85% positivity) and tumors with intermediate staining, reflecting interpretive challenges near clinical decision thresholds. Pathologists demonstrated high reproducibility in FRα IHC assessment, particularly in estimating percentage positivity and control adequacy. These findings support the clinical utility of FRα IHC but underscore the need for standardized scoring criteria and potential integration of digital tools to enhance consistency, especially in borderline cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26167687
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interobserver Agreement in Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Folate Receptor Alpha (FRα) in Ovarian Cancer: A Multicentre Study

Giuseppe Angelico, Antonio De Leo, Paola Campisi, Biagio Paolini et al.
2 citations
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
3.40
article

Interobserver Agreement in Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Folate Receptor Alpha (FRα) in Ovarian Cancer: A Multicentre Study

Giuseppe Angelico, Antonio De Leo, Paola Campisi, Biagio Paolini, Elena Guerini‐Rocco, Anna Caliò, Giancarlo Troncone, Angela Santoro, M. Vinci, Gerardo Ferrara, Gian Franco Zannoni, Giulia Scaglione, Antonio d’Amati, Martina Iuzzolino, Nicoletta D’Alessandris, Belen Padial Urtueta, Alessandra Punzi, Lucia Lerda
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Folate receptor alpha (FRα) is a high-affinity folate transporter overexpressed in various epithelial malignancies, particularly high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Given its restricted expression in normal tissues and accessibility in tumors, FRα is an emerging therapeutic target. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the standard method for FRα assessment; however, interpretation is semi-quantitative and prone to interobserver variability. This study aimed to evaluate interobserver agreement among 12 pathologists in the IHC assessment of FRα in ovarian cancer, focusing on internal control adequacy, staining intensity, and the percentage of FRα-positive tumor cells. Thirty-seven high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma cases were stained using the VENTANA FOLR1 (FOLR1-2.1) RxDx Assay. A reference panel of four expert pathologists established consensus diagnoses. Twelve pathologists independently assessed the slides, recording internal control adequacy, staining intensity (positive vs. negative), and percentage of FRα-positive tumor cells. Interobserver agreement was measured using Fleiss' kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Agreement on internal control adequacy was almost perfect (κ = 0.84). Substantial agreement was observed for staining intensity (κ = 0.76), while percentage estimation showed almost perfect concordance (ICC = 0.89). Discrepancies were primarily confined to borderline cases (65-85% positivity) and tumors with intermediate staining, reflecting interpretive challenges near clinical decision thresholds. Pathologists demonstrated high reproducibility in FRα IHC assessment, particularly in estimating percentage positivity and control adequacy. These findings support the clinical utility of FRα IHC but underscore the need for standardized scoring criteria and potential integration of digital tools to enhance consistency, especially in borderline cases.

International Journal of Molecular SciencesVol. 26(16)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Verona (IT), Humanitas University (IT), University of Milan (IT), Università degli Studi di Enna Kore (IT), Policlinico Umberto I (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (IT), Istituto Tumori Bari (IT), Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT), Ca' Foncello Hospital (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT), European Institute of Oncology (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.